From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module()
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2024 10:00:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5gn7sqz.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cylj7v6x.ffs@tglx>
On Wed, Sep 04 2024 at 09:08, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04 2024 at 11:32, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
> So the check must be:
>
> if (!static_call_key_has_mods(key))
> break;
>
> I missed the module local case completely in my analysis. Can you please
> modify the condition and retest?
That said. This code is pointlessly noisy for the failure case.
Allocation fails are not a reason to warn about. -ENOMEM is propagated
all the way to the caller, so it's sufficient to emit a pr_warn().
Peter?
Thanks,
tglx
---
--- a/kernel/static_call_inline.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call_inline.c
@@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ static int static_call_module_notify(str
case MODULE_STATE_COMING:
ret = static_call_add_module(mod);
if (ret) {
- WARN(1, "Failed to allocate memory for static calls");
+ pr_warn("Failed to allocate memory for static calls\n");
static_call_del_module(mod);
}
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 8:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-15 8:21 [PATCH] static_call: Fix a wild-memory-access bug in static_call_del_module() Jinjie Ruan
2023-09-15 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-02 12:01 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-02 12:06 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-02 12:07 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-02 12:14 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-09-03 20:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-03 22:58 ` [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly " Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 3:32 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-04 7:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 8:00 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-09-04 8:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-09-04 9:08 ` [PATCH] static_call: Replace pointless WARN_ON() in static_call_module_notify() Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-06 14:41 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 8:03 ` [PATCH] static_call: Handle module init failure correctly in static_call_del_module() Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-04 8:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 9:50 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-05 3:34 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-05 9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-06 23:24 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-09-19 9:53 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-09-24 7:22 ` Mike Rapoport
2024-11-08 8:12 ` Christophe Leroy
2024-11-08 15:49 ` Luis Chamberlain
2024-11-08 16:09 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-11-08 16:22 ` Daniel Gomez
2024-09-04 9:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-04 9:19 ` Jinjie Ruan
2024-09-06 14:41 ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5gn7sqz.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox