From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@redhat.com>
Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen <crecklin@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PING ;)] Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device()
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:15:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5jswtox.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240610155505.GA24299@redhat.com>
On Mon, Jun 10 2024 at 17:55, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> should I redo and/or resend this patch (and the next one on top of it) ?
I lost track of the maze in this discussion. As the patch is obviously
correct, I just apply it as is and any cosmetic changes can go on top.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-10 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-22 15:17 sched/isolation: tick_take_do_timer_from_boot() calls smp_call_function_single() with irqs disabled Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-23 13:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 9:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 14:10 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 15:22 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-24 15:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-24 17:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-24 22:06 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-25 13:51 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-25 14:13 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-26 19:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-26 20:52 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-27 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-27 11:01 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 15:57 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-28 1:02 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 12:19 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-27 16:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-26 20:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-27 9:10 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-27 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-27 11:16 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-28 12:20 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device() Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-28 12:22 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-30 12:40 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: turn tick_do_timer_boot_cpu into boot_cpu_is_nohz_full Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 15:35 ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 21:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-04 5:08 ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-05-30 14:52 ` [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device() Frederic Weisbecker
2024-05-30 16:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-05-30 17:01 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-01 14:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-02 21:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-03 15:41 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-03 21:45 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2024-06-10 15:55 ` [PING ;)] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 18:15 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-06-10 18:26 ` [tip: timers/urgent] tick/nohz_full: Don't " tip-bot2 for Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 19:42 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5jswtox.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=crecklin@redhat.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pauld@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox