From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C419F15A8 for ; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 18:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718043314; cv=none; b=T+JoQl/BvXS2nrflo9UeCdTKGzF47qKBWDG3mbZpx4rVJjuqT5S/FSpSUV61lPfUqkeS6MkAONZBW7bAdeB/ApC6dc+aV+EybCNIvYrJuKTVND1RFC1vrcXUhTjh1c/C175VF+leYxIU42RFafRQLpk7AupLwC1TTQtRthQCJAM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718043314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=sD/bjF2RAARHIGuNZ/Q/kDWVIckezuEJvcWCW1FNczg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jE6TxySwpjG8z2jxFjItOyzup8t3PyRzliANxibIPeShblCeXMBq4gpZDBWaVTVKuSQGuEiiYnO7hYq+sifbZLXMzum2Ecmu3Gbm5JiYLkOr2CN0CgIiYAgUP7JjmxOt/FHsxw24AqDr7+n9ScsMtFnSkwfU/Cr/C07AN71dyYI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=eWWh6qhe; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=KZ2OuqML; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="eWWh6qhe"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="KZ2OuqML" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1718043311; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iKpSaBS2J5QNi45aNA+4lE99CInNxMob04aROs5f4ew=; b=eWWh6qhe6Dpz4oyJrwoutQlpCS2A34eX1lOALVvffqR+qGyg7vxUGVJSsHY1v2jFsgVBrH JuDfB+WYbpGVUu2PBimy1NDYd0OCIXjChlenkY9i0T7AjJrHgfYn+I0AyEzAg8tnWLjV9G Ci6zCGUEMIU4Mr89As+W0AJ1L8d6vfWpRHqHyRvL5gccxDRVaeImnHdumm9k17AYr6JWus h/33WboV3uiHwQ/D+3ckkQ9xKUc1CEzDmJkumRa/+I8C7T4TXsCYgnWAgkqEK8im06DJCv RV9WUwOrakFPgLHdzjKDsBHPKCNXLNN2oZBKXqpD4K5vlPTuWtAIevrFvawCnQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1718043311; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iKpSaBS2J5QNi45aNA+4lE99CInNxMob04aROs5f4ew=; b=KZ2OuqMLgjM1VIw6HtQSccnXx89SaSzfIXzN7fJBVY8WozTJfR6hiU5/302D8p+th1qn34 lLXF9P1wuSy6V8AQ== To: Oleg Nesterov , Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , Nicholas Piggin , Peter Zijlstra , Phil Auld Cc: Chris von Recklinghausen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PING ;)] Re: [PATCH] tick/nohz_full: don't abuse smp_call_function_single() in tick_setup_device() In-Reply-To: <20240610155505.GA24299@redhat.com> References: <20240522151742.GA10400@redhat.com> <20240528122019.GA28794@redhat.com> <20240610155505.GA24299@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 20:15:10 +0200 Message-ID: <87a5jswtox.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Jun 10 2024 at 17:55, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > should I redo and/or resend this patch (and the next one on top of it) ? I lost track of the maze in this discussion. As the patch is obviously correct, I just apply it as is and any cosmetic changes can go on top. Thanks, tglx