public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
To: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>, Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>,
	Yanteng Si <siyanteng@loongson.cn>,
	"Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs/zh_CN/power: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc()
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2024 08:38:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5p0rp5z.fsf@meer.lwn.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240120122204.4287-1-erick.archer@gmx.com>

Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com> writes:

> As noted in the "Deprecated Interfaces, Language Features, Attributes,
> and Conventions" documentation [1], size calculations (especially
> multiplication) should not be performed in memory allocator (or similar)
> function arguments due to the risk of them overflowing. This could lead
> to values wrapping around and a smaller allocation being made than the
> caller was expecting. Using those allocations could lead to linear
> overflows of heap memory and other misbehaviors.
>
> So, in the example code use the purpose specific kcalloc() function
> instead of the argument size * count in the kzalloc() function.
>
> Link: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/deprecated.html#open-coded-arithmetic-in-allocator-arguments [1]
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/162
> Signed-off-by: Erick Archer <erick.archer@gmx.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> index 8d6e3f6f6202..7470fa2d4c43 100644
> --- a/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/translations/zh_CN/power/opp.rst
> @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count
>  	 {
>  		/* 做一些事情 */
>  		num_available = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(dev);
> -		speeds = kzalloc(sizeof(u32) * num_available, GFP_KERNEL);
> +		speeds = kcalloc(num_available, sizeof(u32), GFP_KERNEL);

Without addressing the validity of this change, as Hu says, we should
never change the translations without fixing the original as well -
otherwise they aren't really translations anymore.

Thanks,

jon

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-20 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-20 12:22 [PATCH] docs/zh_CN/power: Use kcalloc() instead of kzalloc() Erick Archer
2024-01-20 14:24 ` Hu Haowen
2024-01-21 10:02   ` Erick Archer
2024-01-20 15:38 ` Jonathan Corbet [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87a5p0rp5z.fsf@meer.lwn.net \
    --to=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=erick.archer@gmx.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=siyanteng@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox