From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [195.135.223.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E46B211C; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="i4QjwUUn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="UKJuc0vh"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="i4QjwUUn"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=suse.de header.i=@suse.de header.b="UKJuc0vh" Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org [IPv6:2a07:de40:b281:104:10:150:64:97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FFAC21D10; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:28:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704018539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gU/7SX+x84Zafnu4sZDk7oJ3cJRBbNvRTFmeeU4ZD7U=; b=i4QjwUUnP8EfCdJ6pSO98lkC2eo1ztbDer+ThE3OUzQxH/79lCPVN9DXf6uqHIDcqQdDGC yEMVZipdE3Xcd0R//urWYxog+gCP55HGkBmmX28Dj+RlgcFX36Z3nzvpyKBOTCQAgwtCM4 MIi9XxAc81qC5ds7abr+u4L7grhtbqo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704018539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gU/7SX+x84Zafnu4sZDk7oJ3cJRBbNvRTFmeeU4ZD7U=; b=UKJuc0vhL8oLAgU78kqQqELwPa2vszCdM0e6n2gqVa8WR9yZu/VLK8293dqrjjr1XJxYRf GKoFoscWZFupInBQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_rsa; t=1704018539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gU/7SX+x84Zafnu4sZDk7oJ3cJRBbNvRTFmeeU4ZD7U=; b=i4QjwUUnP8EfCdJ6pSO98lkC2eo1ztbDer+ThE3OUzQxH/79lCPVN9DXf6uqHIDcqQdDGC yEMVZipdE3Xcd0R//urWYxog+gCP55HGkBmmX28Dj+RlgcFX36Z3nzvpyKBOTCQAgwtCM4 MIi9XxAc81qC5ds7abr+u4L7grhtbqo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.de; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1704018539; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=gU/7SX+x84Zafnu4sZDk7oJ3cJRBbNvRTFmeeU4ZD7U=; b=UKJuc0vhL8oLAgU78kqQqELwPa2vszCdM0e6n2gqVa8WR9yZu/VLK8293dqrjjr1XJxYRf GKoFoscWZFupInBQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C0691398B; Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:28:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([10.150.64.162]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id 94VCDWtCkWUGNwAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Sun, 31 Dec 2023 10:28:59 +0000 Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2023 11:28:58 +0100 Message-ID: <87a5pqwtqt.wl-tiwai@suse.de> From: Takashi Iwai To: peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com Cc: Dominik Brodowski , lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: Oops in hdac_hda_dev_probe (6.7-rc7) In-Reply-To: <87plyovwg7.wl-tiwai@suse.de> References: <87sf3lxiet.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <874jg1x7ao.wl-tiwai@suse.de> <87plyovwg7.wl-tiwai@suse.de> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/27.2 Mule/6.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Level: Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=i4QjwUUn; dkim=pass header.d=suse.de header.s=susede2_ed25519 header.b=UKJuc0vh X-Rspamd-Server: rspamd2.dmz-prg2.suse.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.51 / 50.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVRCPT(0.00)[gmail.com]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.de:s=susede2_rsa,suse.de:s=susede2_ed25519]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[suse.de:+]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWELVE(0.00)[13]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[suse.de:dkim]; FUZZY_BLOCKED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[dominikbrodowski.net,gmail.com,kernel.org,perex.cz,suse.com,alsa-project.org,vger.kernel.org,linux.intel.com,lists.linux.dev]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%] X-Spam-Score: -3.51 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 9FFAC21D10 X-Spam-Flag: NO On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 11:03:36 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote: > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2023 08:27:43 +0100, > Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > > Am Fri, Dec 29, 2023 at 06:11:43PM +0100 schrieb Takashi Iwai: > > > On Fri, 29 Dec 2023 16:24:18 +0100, > > > Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Takashi, > > > > > > > > many thanks for your response. Your patch helps half-way: the oops goes > > > > away, but so does the sound... With your patch, the decisive lines in dmesg > > > > are: > > > > > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware info: version 2:2:0-57864 > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware: ABI 3:22:1 Kernel ABI 3:23:0 > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: CODEC DAI intel-hdmi-hifi1 not registered > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: snd_soc_register_card failed -517 > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: CODEC DAI intel-hdmi-hifi1 not registered > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: snd_soc_register_card failed -517 > > > > platform sof_sdw: deferred probe pending > > > > > > > > With a revert of the a0575b4add21, it is: > > > > > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware info: version 2:2:0-57864 > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware: ABI 3:22:1 Kernel ABI 3:23:0 > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Topology: ABI 3:22:1 Kernel ABI 3:23:0 > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: Parent card not yet available, widget card binding deferred > > > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: hda_dsp_hdmi_build_controls: no PCM in topology for HDMI converter 3 > > > > input: sof-soundwire HDMI/DP,pcm=5 as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/sof_sdw/sound/card0/input14 > > > > input: sof-soundwire HDMI/DP,pcm=6 as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/sof_sdw/sound/card0/input15 > > > > input: sof-soundwire HDMI/DP,pcm=7 as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1f.3/sof_sdw/sound/card0/input16 > > > > > > > > Maybe this helps a bit further? > > > > > > Thanks for quick testing. > > > It shows at least that my guess wasn't wrong. > > > > > > The problem could be the initialization order in the caller side. > > > Can the patch below work instead? > > > > Unfortunately, no: > > > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware info: version 2:2:0-57864 > > sof-audio-pci-intel-tgl 0000:00:1f.3: Firmware: ABI 3:22:1 Kernel ABI 3:23:0 > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: CODEC DAI intel-hdmi-hifi1 not registered > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: snd_soc_register_card failed -517 > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: ASoC: CODEC DAI intel-hdmi-hifi1 not registered > > sof_sdw sof_sdw: snd_soc_register_card failed -517 > > platform sof_sdw: deferred probe pending > > Hm, then it might be the logical failure of that commit. > Peter? FWIW, there was a report on bugzilla, too: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218304 Takashi