From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@linux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Arjan van de Veen <arjan@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Subject: [patch v2 5/6] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 10:23:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a5xe8gid.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230603200459.889612295@linutronix.de>
Subject: x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 2023 15:04:10 +0200
Putting CPUs into INIT is a safer place during kexec() to park CPUs.
Split the INIT assert/deassert sequence out so it can be reused.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V2: Fix rebase screwup
---
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -853,47 +853,38 @@ wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_nmi(int apicid,
return (send_status | accept_status);
}
-static int
-wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
+static void send_init_sequence(int phys_apicid)
{
- unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
- int maxlvt, num_starts, j;
-
- maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
+ int maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
- /*
- * Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors.
- */
+ /* Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors. */
if (APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
- if (maxlvt > 3) /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
+ /* Due to the Pentium erratum 3AP. */
+ if (maxlvt > 3)
apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
apic_read(APIC_ESR);
}
- pr_debug("Asserting INIT\n");
-
- /*
- * Turn INIT on target chip
- */
- /*
- * Send IPI
- */
- apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DM_INIT,
- phys_apicid);
-
- pr_debug("Waiting for send to finish...\n");
- send_status = safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
+ /* Assert INIT on the target CPU */
+ apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_INT_ASSERT | APIC_DM_INIT, phys_apicid);
+ safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
udelay(init_udelay);
- pr_debug("Deasserting INIT\n");
-
- /* Target chip */
- /* Send IPI */
+ /* Deassert INIT on the target CPU */
apic_icr_write(APIC_INT_LEVELTRIG | APIC_DM_INIT, phys_apicid);
+ safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
+}
+
+/*
+ * Wake up AP by INIT, INIT, STARTUP sequence.
+ */
+static int wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(int phys_apicid, unsigned long start_eip)
+{
+ unsigned long send_status = 0, accept_status = 0;
+ int num_starts, j, maxlvt = lapic_get_maxlvt();
- pr_debug("Waiting for send to finish...\n");
- send_status = safe_apic_wait_icr_idle();
+ send_init_sequence(phys_apicid);
mb();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-05 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-03 20:06 [patch 0/6] Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() troubles Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:06 ` [patch 1/6] x86/smp: Remove pointless wmb() from native_stop_other_cpus() Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:06 ` [patch 2/6] x86/smp: Acquire stopping_cpu unconditionally Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 3/6] x86/smp: Use dedicated cache-line for mwait_play_dead() Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 4/6] x86/smp: Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() breakage Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:54 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-04 3:19 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 7:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 5/6] x86/smp: Split sending INIT IPI out into a helper function Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-04 4:02 ` Mika Penttilä
2023-06-04 10:24 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 7:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-05 8:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2023-06-03 20:07 ` [patch 6/6] x86/smp: Put CPUs into INIT on shutdown if possible Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-03 20:57 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-05 17:41 ` [patch 0/6] Cure kexec() vs. mwait_play_dead() troubles Sean Christopherson
2023-06-05 22:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-05 23:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-06 7:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2023-06-07 16:21 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-07 17:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-07 22:19 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-08 3:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-08 4:03 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 15:07 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 19:00 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-16 19:03 ` Ashok Raj
2023-06-16 19:08 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-06-09 8:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a5xe8gid.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox