From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: X86-kernel <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
alison.schofield@intel.com, reinette.chatre@intel.com
Subject: Re: [Patch V1 2/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove retries on early microcode load
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2022 20:01:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a645pr31.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221129210832.107850-3-ashok.raj@intel.com>
On Tue, Nov 29 2022 at 13:08, Ashok Raj wrote:
> Microcode loading can fail. This happens today when handling mixed
> steppings. But it can also happen for other reasons such as corrupted
> image, Security Version Number (SVN) preventing anti-rollback,
> dependencies on BIOS loaded microcode image for some capabilities.
>
> When the microcode loading fails, the kernel will quietly hang at boot.
> This has been observed by end users (Links below) who had to revert their
> microcode packages in order to boot again.
>
> The hang is due to an infinite retry loop. The retries were in place to
> support systems with mixed steppings. Now that mixed steppings are no
> longer supported, there is only one microcode image at a time. Any retries
> will simply reattempt to apply the same image over and over without making
> progress.
>
> Some possible past bugs that could be due to this bug are below.
>
> There is no direct evidence that these end user issues were caused by this
> retry loop. However, the early boot hangs along with reverting the
> microcode update workaround provide strong circumstantial evidence to
> support the theory that they are linked.
>
> Remove the retry loop and only attempt to apply microcode once.
Very concise and informative changelog. See, you can do it :)
> Link: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/intel-microcode/+bug/1911959
> Link: https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?p=1827032#1827032
> Link: https://askubuntu.com/questions/1291486/boot-crash-after-latest-update-of-intel-microcode-nov-11-2020
> Fixes: 06b8534cb728 ("x86/microcode: Rework microcode loading")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Nit: Can you order the tags according to the tip documentation next time
please?
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-02 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-29 21:08 [Patch V1 0/7] x86/microcode: Some cleanups and fixes for microcode Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 1/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove redundant microcode rev pr_info()s Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 18:58 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 0:26 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-03 13:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 2/7] x86/microcode/intel: Remove retries on early microcode load Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-12-03 1:48 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 23:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-12-03 1:47 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 12:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-05 16:42 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 20:53 ` [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not retry microcode reloading on the APs tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 3/7] x86/microcode/core: Move microcode_check() to cpu/microcode/core.c Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-02 20:57 ` Sohil Mehta
2022-12-03 0:21 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 16:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-05 17:05 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-05 21:27 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 4/7] x86/microcode/core: Take a snapshot before and after applying microcode Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-03 1:57 ` Ashok Raj
2022-12-07 20:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-08 0:05 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 5/7] x86/microcode/intel: Prepare the print_ucode_rev to simply take a rev to print Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 6/7] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev during early boot Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-11-29 21:08 ` [Patch V1 7/7] x86/microcode/intel: Print when early microcode loading fails Ashok Raj
2022-12-02 19:30 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-12-05 18:19 ` Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a645pr31.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alison.schofield@intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox