From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>, Megha Dey <megha.dey@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [patch 03/10] genirq/msi: Make MSI descriptor alloc/free ready for range allocations
Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2021 20:17:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a6hof5sr.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8735ngs26o.wl-maz@kernel.org>
On Sun, Nov 28 2021 at 15:57, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 01:24:34 +0000,
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>
> The issue seems to be originating in the previous patch, where the
> following line was added:
>
> + struct msi_range range = { .first = 0, .last = UINT_MAX, .ndesc = nvec, };
>
> In that context, only 'ndesc' was used, and that was fine.
>
> However, in the current patch, ndesc use is removed, only first/last
> are considered, and UINT_MAX is... a lot of MSIs.
>
> This fixes it:
>
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/msi.c b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> index bef5b74a7268..a520bfd94a56 100644
> --- a/kernel/irq/msi.c
> +++ b/kernel/irq/msi.c
> @@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ int msi_domain_alloc_irqs_descs_locked(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device
> */
> int msi_domain_alloc_irqs(struct irq_domain *domain, struct device *dev, int nvec)
> {
> - struct msi_range range = { .first = 0, .last = UINT_MAX, .ndesc = nvec, };
> + struct msi_range range = { .first = 0, .last = nvec - 1, .ndesc = nvec, };
> int ret;
>
> msi_lock_descs(dev);
>
> However, it'd be good to clarify the use of range->ndesc.
Hrm. The stupid search should terminated nevertheless. Let me stare at
it again.
>> -static int msi_add_simple_msi_descs(struct device *dev, unsigned int index, unsigned int ndesc)
>> +static int msi_add_simple_msi_descs(struct device *dev, struct msi_range *range)
>
> nit: most of the functions changed in this patch need to have their
> documentation tidied up.
Duh, yes.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-28 19:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-27 1:24 [patch 00/10] genirq/msi, PCI/MSI: Support for dynamic MSI-X vector expansion - Part 4 Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 01/10] genirq/msi: Add range argument to alloc/free MSI domain ops Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 02/10] genirq/msi: Add range argument to msi_domain_alloc/free_descs_locked() Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 03/10] genirq/msi: Make MSI descriptor alloc/free ready for range allocations Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-28 15:57 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-11-28 19:17 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-11-29 17:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 05/10] genirq/msi: Add domain info flag MSI_FLAG_CAN_EXPAND Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 06/10] PCI/MSI: Use range in allocation path Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 08/10] PCI/MSI: Provide pci_msi_domain_supports_expand() Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 10/10] x86/apic/msi: Support MSI-X vector expansion Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` [patch 00/10] genirq/msi, PCI/MSI: Support for dynamic MSI-X vector expansion - Part 4 Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` [patch 04/10] genirq/msi: Prepare MSI domain alloc/free for range irq allocation Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` [patch 07/10] PCI/MSI: Make free related functions range based Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:25 ` [patch 09/10] PCI/MSI: Provide pci_msix_expand_vectors[_at]() Thomas Gleixner
2021-11-27 1:24 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-02 1:08 ` Dey, Megha
2021-12-02 10:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-02 19:21 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-12-02 20:40 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-12-03 0:45 ` Raj, Ashok
2021-12-03 12:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a6hof5sr.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=amc96@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=megha.dey@intel.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox