From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/nohz: Optimize get_nohz_timer_target()
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 15:12:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a76v8knv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANRm+Cw1eTNgB1r79J7U__ynio7pMSR4Xa35XuQuj-JKAQGxmg@mail.gmail.com>
Wanpeng,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> writes:
> Hi Thomas,
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 16:29, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> > I didn't see your refactor to get_nohz_timer_target() which you
>> > mentioned in IRC after four months, I can observe cyclictest drop from
>> > 4~5us to 8us in kvm guest(we offload the lapic timer emulation to
>> > housekeeping cpu to avoid timer fire external interrupt on the pCPU
>> > which vCPU resident incur a vCPU vmexit) w/o this patch in the case of
>> > there is no busy housekeeping cpu. The score can be recovered after I
>> > give stress to create a busy housekeeping cpu.
>> >
>> > Could you consider applying this patch for temporary since I'm not
>> > sure when the refactor can be ready.
>>
>> Yeah. It's delayed (again).... Will pick that up.
>
> I didn't find WIP tag for this work after ~half year since v4 was
> posted https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/28/231 Could you apply this patch
> for temporary because the completion time of refactor is not
> deterministic.
Could you please repost it?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-10 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-28 0:43 [PATCH v2] sched/nohz: Optimize get_nohz_timer_target() Wanpeng Li
2019-06-28 0:43 ` [PATCH RESEND v3] sched/isolation: Prefer housekeeping cpu in local node Wanpeng Li
2019-06-28 1:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-06-28 6:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-06-28 7:19 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-06-28 8:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2019-06-28 1:10 ` [PATCH v2] sched/nohz: Optimize get_nohz_timer_target() Frederic Weisbecker
2019-10-23 8:16 ` Wanpeng Li
2019-10-23 8:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-10-23 9:25 ` Wanpeng Li
2020-01-06 6:21 ` Wanpeng Li
2020-01-10 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-01-13 1:32 ` Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a76v8knv.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox