From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932171AbeENNLl (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 09:11:41 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:39640 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753270AbeENNLi (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 May 2018 09:11:38 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: David Miller Cc: rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, stephen@networkplumber.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ganeshgr@chelsio.com, nirranjan@chelsio.com, indranil@chelsio.com References: <20180513.201131.1649805811466916646.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Mon, 14 May 2018 08:11:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180513.201131.1649805811466916646.davem@davemloft.net> (David Miller's message of "Sun, 13 May 2018 20:11:31 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87a7t2mlfn.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1fIDGJ-0003e1-CA;;;mid=<87a7t2mlfn.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.90.247.198;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX19Q6dDyJAP4aZhN9lyB6Kpn1tjXjoTW7Jo= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.90.247.198 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4672] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;David Miller X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 1057 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.06 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 2.9 (0.3%), b_tie_ro: 1.93 (0.2%), parse: 1.17 (0.1%), extract_message_metadata: 29 (2.7%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.47 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (1.1%), tests_pri_-950: 2.0 (0.2%), tests_pri_-900: 1.65 (0.2%), tests_pri_-400: 31 (2.9%), check_bayes: 29 (2.7%), b_tokenize: 10 (0.9%), b_tok_get_all: 8 (0.7%), b_comp_prob: 3.4 (0.3%), b_tok_touch_all: 3.5 (0.3%), b_finish: 2.3 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 308 (29.2%), check_dkim_signature: 0.84 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.5 (0.4%), tests_pri_500: 664 (62.9%), poll_dns_idle: 656 (62.0%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/3] kernel: add support to collect hardware logs in crash recovery kernel X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Miller writes: > I'm deferring this patch series. > > If we can't get a reasonable review from an interested party in 10+ > days, that is not reasonable. > > Resubmit this once someone reviews it properly. David I am out on vacation this week and last (the reason for the delay). The last version of this that I looked at I gave my ack. All of my ABI concerns had been addressed. The only outstanding change I believe was the Eric Dumazet's asking about something being reviewed. I just glanced over it again and I don't see any new issues introduced by the last round of changes. >>From 10,000 feet flyover design perspectie and from an ABI perspective this patchset seems fine. Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Eric