From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756126AbaFYWrR (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:47:17 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f47.google.com ([209.85.215.47]:44824 "EHLO mail-la0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752199AbaFYWrQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jun 2014 18:47:16 -0400 From: Rasmus Villemoes To: Andrew Morton Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , Don Mullis , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] lib: list_sort: Various minor improvements Organization: D03 References: <1403604392-23259-1-git-send-email-linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20140625145314.3e16af6998765b7aad860bf7@linux-foundation.org> <87egycoc8t.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> <20140625153246.3d3dbda781ce1af5524269ab@linux-foundation.org> X-Hashcash: 1:20:140625:don.mullis@gmail.com::X6Iyv9pXxogpUHKH:000000000000000000000000000000000000000000OrG X-Hashcash: 1:20:140625:akpm@linux-foundation.org::emVNaI2VBpk0ihx3:00000000000000000000000000000000000050gp X-Hashcash: 1:20:140625:artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com::50ecMTCWH9jK+MWm:000000000000000000000000000003k0j X-Hashcash: 1:20:140625:david@fromorbit.com::uWF9GBJVHoxFgYt9:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000004Wbf X-Hashcash: 1:20:140625:linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org::miY5u9pW+7m7drXK:0000000000000000000000000000000005nNi Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:47:12 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140625153246.3d3dbda781ce1af5524269ab@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 15:32:46 -0700") Message-ID: <87a990obdb.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Andrew Morton writes: > On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:28:18 +0200 Rasmus Villemoes wrote: > >> Minor comment: Won't this end up saying "list_sort_test: list passed to >> ...", despite the list coming from a 'real' user? Maybe change the first >> #define to '"list_sort: " fmt', the above message to "passed list too >> long for efficiency", and redefine pr_fmt right after #ifdef >> CONFIG_TEST_LIST_SORT. > > Yeah, I was hoping nobody would notice that ;) > > How about just > > printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "list too long for efficiency\n"); FWIW, fine by me. Rasmus