From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:43:38 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a9xys53h.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <502932A0.3060001@xenotime.net>
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 10:00:16 -0700, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
> On 07/26/2012 08:18 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>
> > On 07/25/2012 10:04 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Please do not add anything to linux-next included branches/series that is
> >> destined for v3.7 until after v3.6-rc1 is released.
> >>
> >> Reminder: do not rebase your branches before asking Linus to pull them ...
> >>
> >> Changes since 20120725:
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > uml on x86_64 (defconfig) build fails with:
> >
> > CC arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o
> > arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.c:96:5: error: redefinition of 'apply_relocate_add'
> > include/linux/moduleloader.h:64:19: note: previous definition of 'apply_relocate_add' was here
> > make[2]: *** [arch/x86/um/../kernel/module.o] Error 1
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> Adding Rusty.
>
>
> This build error is still happening for uml on x86_64
> in linux-next 20120813.
No huge surprise, I'll punt this to David Howells :)
Cheers,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-14 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-26 5:04 linux-next: Tree for July 26 Stephen Rothwell
2012-07-26 15:18 ` linux-next: Tree for July 26 (uml) Randy Dunlap
2012-08-13 17:00 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-14 0:13 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-08-14 14:26 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:31 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 14:51 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:54 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:57 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 15:06 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 15:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 15:15 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 15:17 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-08-14 17:41 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-20 2:51 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-21 17:43 ` Randy Dunlap
2012-08-22 1:17 ` Rusty Russell
2012-08-14 15:09 ` David Howells
2012-08-14 14:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2012-07-26 15:43 ` linux-next: Tree for July 26 (vfio) Randy Dunlap
2012-07-26 16:16 ` Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a9xys53h.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).