* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
[not found] ` <1268261495-686-5-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
@ 2010-03-10 23:18 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 7:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi " Joe Perches
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2010-03-10 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
> if (uni_xlate == 1) {
> - *op = ':';
> - for (k = 4; k > 0; k--) {
> - nc = ec & 0xF;
> - op[k] = nc > 9 ? nc + ('a' - 10)
> - : nc + '0';
> - ec >>= 4;
> - }
> - op += 5;
> + *op++ = ':';
> + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);
> + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);
> + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);
> + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);
> len -= 5;
Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
2010-03-10 23:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one OGAWA Hirofumi
@ 2010-03-11 7:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 9:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi " Joe Perches
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2010-03-11 7:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OGAWA Hirofumi; +Cc: linux-kernel
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 678 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:18 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi<hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> wrote:>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);>> + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);> Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?No specific reason, it could be so. Would you like me to change this?
-- With Best Regards,Andy Shevchenkoÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
2010-03-10 23:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 7:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2010-03-11 7:21 ` Joe Perches
2010-03-11 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2010-03-11 7:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OGAWA Hirofumi; +Cc: Andy Shevchenko, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 08:18 +0900, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > if (uni_xlate == 1) {
> > - *op = ':';
> > - for (k = 4; k > 0; k--) {
> > - nc = ec & 0xF;
> > - op[k] = nc > 9 ? nc + ('a' - 10)
> > - : nc + '0';
> > - ec >>= 4;
> > - }
> > - op += 5;
> > + *op++ = ':';
> > + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);
> > + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);
> > + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);
> > + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);
> > len -= 5;
>
> Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?
or snprintf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
2010-03-11 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi " Joe Perches
@ 2010-03-11 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 8:10 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2010-03-11 7:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joe Perches; +Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi, linux-kernel
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8, Size: 638 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:>> > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);>> > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);>> > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);>> > + Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);>> Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?> or snprintfsprintf looks like overkill here.
-- With Best Regards,Andy Shevchenkoÿôèº{.nÇ+·®+%Ëÿ±éݶ\x17¥wÿº{.nÇ+·¥{±þG«éÿ{ayº\x1dÊÚë,j\a¢f£¢·hïêÿêçz_è®\x03(éÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?¨èÚ&£ø§~á¶iOæ¬z·vØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?I¥
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
2010-03-11 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2010-03-11 8:10 ` Joe Perches
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2010-03-11 8:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi, linux-kernel
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 09:59 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:21 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >> > + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);
> >> > + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);
> >> > + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);
> >> > + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);
> >> Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?
> > or snprintf
> sprintf looks like overkill here.
It's shorter and more intelligible though
op += sprintf(op, ":%04x:%04x", etc)
cheers, Joe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one
2010-03-11 7:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2010-03-11 9:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 15:00 ` [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() " Andy Shevchenko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2010-03-11 9:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-kernel
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 1:18 AM, OGAWA Hirofumi
> <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
>>> + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec >> 8);
>>> + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec >> 8);
>>> + *op++ = hex_asc_hi(ec);
>>> + *op++ = hex_asc_lo(ec);
>> Why doesn't this use pack_hex_byte()?
> No specific reason, it could be so. Would you like me to change this?
Yes, please change it if you have no problem.
Thanks.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() instead of custom one
2010-03-11 9:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
@ 2010-03-11 15:00 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 15:12 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2010-03-11 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OGAWA Hirofumi, linux-kernel; +Cc: Andy Shevchenko
From: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@nokia.com>
---
fs/fat/dir.c | 14 +++++---------
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
index 530b4ca..5de1a70 100644
--- a/fs/fat/dir.c
+++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/buffer_head.h>
#include <linux/compat.h>
#include <asm/uaccess.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include "fat.h"
/*
@@ -149,19 +150,14 @@ static int uni16_to_x8(unsigned char *ascii, const wchar_t *uni, int len,
while (*ip && ((len - NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE) > 0)) {
ec = *ip++;
- if ( (charlen = nls->uni2char(ec, op, NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE)) > 0) {
+ if ((charlen = nls->uni2char(ec, op, NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE)) > 0) {
op += charlen;
len -= charlen;
} else {
if (uni_xlate == 1) {
- *op = ':';
- for (k = 4; k > 0; k--) {
- nc = ec & 0xF;
- op[k] = nc > 9 ? nc + ('a' - 10)
- : nc + '0';
- ec >>= 4;
- }
- op += 5;
+ *op++ = ':';
+ op = pack_hex_byte(op, ec >> 8);
+ op = pack_hex_byte(op, ec);
len -= 5;
} else {
*op++ = '?';
--
1.5.6.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() instead of custom one
2010-03-11 15:00 ` [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() " Andy Shevchenko
@ 2010-03-11 15:12 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 15:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <1268468961-17033-1-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2010-03-11 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@nokia.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <ext-andriy.shevchenko@nokia.com>
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
(From 1/4 with previous patch, I guess it's series of patches) Or I
should take this patch into my tree?
Thanks.
> ---
> fs/fat/dir.c | 14 +++++---------
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fat/dir.c b/fs/fat/dir.c
> index 530b4ca..5de1a70 100644
> --- a/fs/fat/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/fat/dir.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
> #include <linux/buffer_head.h>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include "fat.h"
>
> /*
> @@ -149,19 +150,14 @@ static int uni16_to_x8(unsigned char *ascii, const wchar_t *uni, int len,
>
> while (*ip && ((len - NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE) > 0)) {
> ec = *ip++;
> - if ( (charlen = nls->uni2char(ec, op, NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE)) > 0) {
> + if ((charlen = nls->uni2char(ec, op, NLS_MAX_CHARSET_SIZE)) > 0) {
> op += charlen;
> len -= charlen;
> } else {
> if (uni_xlate == 1) {
> - *op = ':';
> - for (k = 4; k > 0; k--) {
> - nc = ec & 0xF;
> - op[k] = nc > 9 ? nc + ('a' - 10)
> - : nc + '0';
> - ec >>= 4;
> - }
> - op += 5;
> + *op++ = ':';
> + op = pack_hex_byte(op, ec >> 8);
> + op = pack_hex_byte(op, ec);
> len -= 5;
> } else {
> *op++ = '?';
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() instead of custom one
2010-03-11 15:12 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
@ 2010-03-11 15:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <1268468961-17033-1-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2010-03-11 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: OGAWA Hirofumi; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 5:12 PM, OGAWA Hirofumi
<hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> wrote:
> (From 1/4 with previous patch, I guess it's series of patches) Or I
> should take this patch into my tree?
It has only one in common - cleanup. Basically it's a bunch of
independent fixes.
Please, take it in your tree. thank you.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCHv3] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() instead of custom one
[not found] ` <1268468961-17033-1-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
@ 2010-03-13 11:09 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: OGAWA Hirofumi @ 2010-03-13 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com> writes:
> const wchar_t *ip;
> wchar_t ec;
> - unsigned char *op, nc;
> + unsigned char *op;
> int charlen;
> - int k;
Ah, thanks. I fixed this myself before commit.
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-03-13 11:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1268261495-686-1-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1268261495-686-2-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1268261495-686-3-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1268261495-686-4-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1268261495-686-5-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
2010-03-10 23:18 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi instead of custom one OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 7:14 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 9:03 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 15:00 ` [PATCHv2] fs: fat: use pack_hex_byte() " Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 15:12 ` OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 15:15 ` Andy Shevchenko
[not found] ` <1268468961-17033-1-git-send-email-andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
2010-03-13 11:09 ` [PATCHv3] " OGAWA Hirofumi
2010-03-11 7:21 ` [PATCH 4/5] fs: fat: use hex_asc_lo/hex_asc_hi " Joe Perches
2010-03-11 7:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2010-03-11 8:10 ` Joe Perches
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox