From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BECF22FFFA4 for ; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 21:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774562365; cv=none; b=aCT+HE3GPqO381Y161d4j4dttLM3Y3NBUpBFS1ZbJjmG3jsAf+EJYXgU8uOXFvrbhzePRZrG8D0Gj4WOpLZkLB2sQUtJFFwPP4cswtx9DHZB+JnebPklha9veY/o5YmzkIlK1RyleniUvJba5AWFhDjzhta8Y57mkCTmi/RJJqQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774562365; c=relaxed/simple; bh=WoOrDZPyZmkzlu6SLXfvTbcPM3kw6pXftAhteSmldhE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iTD5erVYADo0a3LlsYJodfI/7VxCHZ6xXx62GZt1hG78TuHPnATgRvurXvqrOVln4PBpWfp9wSI3+wkltjFZMDIn+98vTH4Df/jX5bmjHQ6F/Bi+BYRgyhY+/OFNwR3nCjpBnLLbJKgBAvmvipjNtNS6MZhoO1M1ZwEupd0SsSw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=dVRIKAu9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="dVRIKAu9" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8BAE8C116C6; Thu, 26 Mar 2026 21:59:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1774562365; bh=WoOrDZPyZmkzlu6SLXfvTbcPM3kw6pXftAhteSmldhE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=dVRIKAu98k7bBBxO0eF15QgXXd+4iYztWTJnkGTB7dakhueUDLYDiMlzDM5oXBpkz O9oGOy7OKOLwmY3Q7XlR7JfcdOt4pR/J1/UpdpYqcMCUeXgYsFa0+XKV5QYFTB8ig6 UWE2EB2281E8tBsgUBInGwS050QJvm024tBDuh7XEuNzY08bkpZQiyR3ixO9DS1TjU eVfnmyANlLphp0X6QMglQevoScCGRHnXKRtGaG6wy587k41IS8+BfKFtB9p4SxmKwj I98kN34BjihPs3UObRBehcgc4TYvHBXsVS6MKVEMC91jZuIZrqnOFDje05NNipkm7V j/i1lVDLpn2Wg== From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers , =?utf-8?Q?Andr?= =?utf-8?Q?=C3=A9?= Almeida , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Carlos O'Donell , Peter Zijlstra , Florian Weimer , Rich Felker , Torvald Riegel , Darren Hart , Ingo Molnar , Davidlohr Bueso , Arnd Bergmann , "Liam R . Howlett" , Uros Bizjak , Thomas =?utf-8?Q?Wei=C3=9Fschuh?= Subject: Re: [patch v2 00/11] futex: Address the robust futex unlock race for real In-Reply-To: <20260319225224.853416463@kernel.org> References: <20260319225224.853416463@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2026 22:59:20 +0100 Message-ID: <87bjgackw7.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Mar 20 2026 at 00:24, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > If the functionality itself is agreed on we only need to agree on the names > and signatures of the functions exposed through the VDSO before we set them > in stone. That will hopefully not take another 15 years :) Have the libc folks any further opinion on the syscall and the vDSO part before I prepare v3? Thanks, tglx