From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FAFA3EBF32; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770378126; cv=none; b=G6TaKHs2TPvjw8n54y4sdX74EifAbVqFPb0yp3Bx2W1Y8pEdQuRb/JFKkXYg0BnQTGxwiOsj7ZVoGVSqsScUVUFng72ICsDXKpofyMLb6LSsqSMRm0L4lRJT6EBLyseKc9GARah3nU52gtMXIiv/OTY985r0jeYd4xKt9mQPo+Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1770378126; c=relaxed/simple; bh=/MoS7vvBrbkY5D2m1Gsx/yi0gPlt2om2upSukML2cjM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kq/i7PDs0QSXpLe1Lxq2eUSh3IeBpneeaIf0QAVJC4u9guqoT08ezxOCLtF2F9pULlBU6Sas0IVolXDrYMztGGp+WjOp01aC06FUVEVg9PeooVXbOdE5dP2NbRYevGPxHqm3POoQmVT3OYx8OO/w+brCT+br/DA3KZ/ZH1yNFxM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z0zY574r; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z0zY574r" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3B7FAC116C6; Fri, 6 Feb 2026 11:42:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1770378125; bh=/MoS7vvBrbkY5D2m1Gsx/yi0gPlt2om2upSukML2cjM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Z0zY574rdFUls9/fHhlu6LGAI6ijCu0NzZbJpGbKlRapZEQ4lP0toaZhZunUHiiEO otXSiYSBWVXzR28kfL+I4SU0WbOlX879o/7RWPv3hdJiTHCKb+ZqGXybl3PukxsQ6P GSvHhtmvUw9SkyCzXFqduo6kilIKw9zRIhQJ8hM7GtdQlQ4lbmURj0glYglGi11CiE yQKdDOFaH9ZGLrfr9Dn+ZiaosR7yn2tnbFFj/RQXSGPOeLnzXOyabT/g5HFtV+I/JC mSd1wXxicw5lqrP5FbjvsPZmktYeKR1n8Ck8B+4CeUO7JuG+Ex3zCoRVoDNiMyu+Rz 6BRfn8Jcv5tOQ== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Biju Cc: Biju Das , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven , Prabhakar Mahadev Lad , Biju Das , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Make fwspec variable as pointer in struct rzg2l_irqc_priv In-Reply-To: <20260206111658.231934-4-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> References: <20260206111658.231934-1-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> <20260206111658.231934-4-biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com> Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2026 12:42:02 +0100 Message-ID: <87bji214l1.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Feb 06 2026 at 11:16, Biju wrote: $Subject: ....: Dynamically allocate fwspec array or such > From: Biju Das > > The total number of IRQs in RZ/G2L and RZ/G3L SoC are different. The s/IRQs/interrupts/ Use proper words and not acronyms. This is not twatter. > RZ/G3L has 16 external IRQs where as RZ/G2L has only 8 external IRQ. > Dynamicaly allocate fwspec memory instead of static allocation to support Dynamically Thanks, tglx