From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3E021A92F for ; Wed, 10 Dec 2025 01:13:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765329191; cv=none; b=G7tnLou5v3JJbKhyWOZd04BvenDW4g3wv3LcmQ+ghlMQvye5fOXSxfaku7Z3ZmInO4OLPxNAmRgp6Egy0JEZ9UKc71Sur+JvdkRXC9KJ9/6KfCYz0oAdTaHUViuAANzpQ7RQC7+FceFO+hcEGJWau0/vmi/R5SveAGD4a9wlsBM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765329191; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nWGSvsX9J/GyjuhCe6o9/4ko79kpUMbJRZ0JIhhcdZ4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=DspYlyFCiLjtnZBH+cunhM4IpdIFu9fm7Tf1797lwNQH+qRPQSrx6XG9CKRZhDUJ/f78IhZILYmOMpnPkomAPxFQ6LCL7vIrGvrzA9XIzj6MON/VU1Bg6TaMd0Lm5eEhT5G0wAdkOooaHjJliSELxJdzdjytix4MnTTRl8J/w3Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=NVSueBEr; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=HgH9T/+F; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="NVSueBEr"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="HgH9T/+F" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1765329187; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sAl+sqE5siyOzPmym8Ut1TB/JTIkea8m6p0IPAHDgtw=; b=NVSueBEryOqylGA4MQ5NVoLudBowPRbXvNkIvgmDYheUvcSLhjaaT24Ce7JCJl6RajlG5T hb6PE7kL6qFaqDk65fG4VfMyHaQmHg+gKhZWHK/OA0VQtqxDHkrXWoisfY+dG3zTTWifCr MB1mxYXfahYS8a+QC2iXdOx8IdC/2dGxMNbdvmW7aKm0g7wKdUxdw5926b46ciawOj0uiV 27Rvxy0yLHMKTnAMLf/R6QNaI6Iz0DDDoMSoPoBK8YseMCChZWrNstHhvm5ElJCoFf2bNh u1yeKrFPG7kymzMZNim8fkgSMOmWSja20+U3cA4cnP82hlDgHOWjsPtue0UBlw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1765329187; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=sAl+sqE5siyOzPmym8Ut1TB/JTIkea8m6p0IPAHDgtw=; b=HgH9T/+FBqmQKbc0ZeKgR50BcjewgQVCIk/xNcFpLAN5OvFmtgmGC7+L3VUdees6fiXmSM JnW/Ogv/cvd6i9Bg== To: Daniel Lezcano , Marc Zyngier Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Fate of CONFIG_IRQ_TIMINGS and co In-Reply-To: <3f3d42d2-13e3-43ef-b839-f77424769add@linaro.org> References: <87zf7vex6h.wl-maz@kernel.org> <3f3d42d2-13e3-43ef-b839-f77424769add@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:13:03 +0900 Message-ID: <87bjk7f8bk.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Mon, Dec 08 2025 at 05:49, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> If this is a work in progress and that there is a line of sight to >> having it working upstream, that's great, and I will happily post the >> few fixes I have for it. Otherwise, can we do ourselves a favour and >> consider dropping it? > > Yes, we already discuss that a few cycles ago with Thomas and, as there > is no progress, it makes sense to remove it. Who is going to send the patch?