From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D2D1C8631; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:36:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762213020; cv=none; b=VQ1x62x5gSM+I6JGzWobGfjIA4rbdEUyWYYVbimlS1mpJlOshvdL09RBzloKUHgiIwAloxVcljnGpsv5I6vgOpApknH5MGAdLAWNjqNJs5nENvekgGqj8uukBA9kTxCMubVU8nf+Ao0h0WNPqzRdc6qryDweC7ifddMNPeuu/vg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762213020; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N55eo52Pcgfxt95Av7Tt7iGJnaLH87zi6nTnO+AdxFE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=FU9s2f4nNOZO5BeqhZiHdCfPHa70c+Un22Z6/fgtFsBH1yHniP5/xjE1VIZT7vBE3HeZVtHvMzoVSP9LVfJ5Epg4PtX4ANj2DAAoajhMiBS/UeWcMvMIZVo9ah5Ar7TllhmQYY2kNvmpOd4Yz36I3h4Y7wk9tlA9gyo0L2dqnzE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=W1Gmhljn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="W1Gmhljn" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net B911740C2A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1762213018; bh=K8PIBNbs70W46i6wcDq6wkYz/yBo/jDRwIBRu7rD6kU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=W1GmhljnEtURIiuRsg76bqLPRr7r6N7R2SL4ienRowJhjt1SKun4lf0DnQJ2DMmdh 8u1TiWGVx79nmzXKwh43CO1V461lvoji6Jz9ePuyCEAZFbR1Dhk8fJR5W9cVSI1hHw /nTkZlkcuqMbRZ6+rNUSTXV3CxiPzyyiNj6XP38JXuGfWYKTk7L+HVxOh6yODLe9Sp FIJTjAK0OnffozTwXOLcu37EOyTY8r9RSOZHHuqKHlHicyWzCy0c698xOgi8pidFLV Uv0dHyFM3kf9NimFJXyyUxX9XqFczfaT43ECASzF62zANDH+MfxT4JqNHWG/Cxfd8X E0BxgXwR/AuZg== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B911740C2A; Mon, 3 Nov 2025 23:36:58 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Gregory Price , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, jonathan.cameron@huawei.com, dave.jiang@intel.com, alison.schofield@intel.com, vishal.l.verma@intel.com, ira.weiny@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, gourry@gourry.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/driver-api/cxl: remove page-allocator quirk section In-Reply-To: <20251003143233.1985150-1-gourry@gourry.net> References: <20251003143233.1985150-1-gourry@gourry.net> Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2025 16:36:57 -0700 Message-ID: <87bjlibsdi.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Gregory Price writes: > The node/zone quirk section of the cxl documentation is incorrect. > The actual reason for fallback allocation misbehavior in the > described configuration is due to a kswapd/reclaim thrashing scenario > fixed by the linked patch. Remove this section. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20250919162134.1098208-1-hannes@cmpxchg.org/ > Signed-off-by: Gregory Price > --- > .../cxl/allocation/page-allocator.rst | 31 ------------------- > 1 file changed, 31 deletions(-) This patch is still outstanding...should I take it through docs? Thanks, jon