From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2A4A25771; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:34:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744724094; cv=none; b=kKAGQi6xyWSUYWnSnTtW3yRWge/HN+Dz43l1VEDybOMNma7Pzw2DEQbuk0IYHkNgrKJ3Ia0vRnn7Vvtg5QGH53PhN0l1kfQtilALh5F/cfXIelCrifxyFXma7/iiH7LevsNEX98ZEqUN06NA/fi8CyQxbSG+Tv6FnecIoX3GdCw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744724094; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZbvVGnkFnCTdW8MWHN32kqUIqhHk59XjTd85RXWZa7w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kO8rRTZmRBKhgTvn0ZLh5dfBblaWbWHpv2sWp28EYMz9dz+2w93bzhlFhI+PWmqDvop6WCF9GOnARcy6uKvo05tJL8ioxjQ9D+DEDeZo8XOx78lGnSq5UC9TAheK+fVzqzByZyXbOCol1wUIUNYsAfMNSN3wQDZBMpE+YikRHco= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=DDoY3gID; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="DDoY3gID" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net ED3CE41086 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1744724092; bh=qq2xMJBZXzE4K+QY6hdl58GPqersIi74JVHAVzQ7s9k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=DDoY3gIDfJxPZpUxEk7czh4g4VPoH6KuBIk8B0Ubx62VEFY9V5X7ZIu49/Owiz12G 7FUD59tpDgpWxTZHHzfRKYxzn49Gbm3g0LsnA+P60ctkx5SmjOeMxHWH2rWsIuNtKl SDow1+t2psIiOdAe7lt7SB18VPmJof+j5kN4w/SsITMRsIqmAfP543rPYuVjt7ObEG m+gYUfigYs2gKi298yRmgWP3kunGSNkP4PgFqnR5jfJWvg6g8BCC89QWlaEgzEx84z /ZMGQJYP/V/FGuyBXwL4HFQOkV8F2N3aXjoj0AWJHPrnthbA1R3DUqX1x0HUDg1G4F BdZrDoZQnrL+w== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED3CE41086; Tue, 15 Apr 2025 13:34:51 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Andy Shevchenko Cc: Jani Nikula , Linux Doc Mailing List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Kees Cook , Russell King , linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/33] Implement kernel-doc in Python In-Reply-To: <20250415180631.180e9a9f@sal.lan> References: <871pu1193r.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <87mscibwm8.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> <87v7r5sw3a.fsf@intel.com> <20250415164014.575c0892@sal.lan> <20250415180631.180e9a9f@sal.lan> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 07:34:51 -0600 Message-ID: <87bjsxblac.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mauro Carvalho Chehab writes: > I'll try to craft a patch along the week to add > PYTHONDONTWRITEBYTECODE=1 to the places where kernel-doc > is called. This may really be all we need. It will be interesting to do some build-time tests; I don't really see this as making much of a difference. Thanks, jon