From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 172A018E763 for ; Fri, 18 Oct 2024 21:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729288772; cv=none; b=JVMYX62BeFjW0NwFjHmzWusZjVFYoPdPaJhyJctwuL8rs0n5+vhR7KpmqV/w+DzYkE7OpgsnkkDZ9wETKqr2ZHVtIKOydDovDeo2BKyz/ruQNSi69gy17FvwEgp/Y0V3M/ZHC2eUUtkaF3ecB0pXB1Ve1YIiurat3fU8n+t16LI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729288772; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XW/A0nJki5YcX5WC3DWS1Neep22TGxvLkdp8pDiWv4Y=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nCXFSU0CLqfAAUIZaUBvt8nkBCimQ/DV4tL90kNp4ErG1DBQwjYOZcX8K2MQ/NIR+GfUzaS9s5KWD53Pw8AkCXHesEdNzuVnC0sbobLL0FcL2mE2fwuVAqj3KwaSIRUXr6EcBvXfeCHNSOK/0Vi/h6A/GHF0zhmngssTKjHbWTE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=rmoMJXT+; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=/7x9dyYA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="rmoMJXT+"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="/7x9dyYA" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1729288161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XW/A0nJki5YcX5WC3DWS1Neep22TGxvLkdp8pDiWv4Y=; b=rmoMJXT+vapPrOcAdYcyWLIsjgGijDZhswletdfHHx62Xsm1uFha7tzksuWm3IsHfsBj/E j/sBzWSy+Q5ucgOMrFY+t0jeGjuXakA21u8aHYCqnJQWh2ygKZCqoBpbEHMW8IZOU9Y9kJ MretUzzJecpGs1NWJR0ryHJTZAQliOmxET0hClpRiWaCec6aMYJa6rZ0XsK21+/9HxezQr vrIlLgXCd11cShnKWt+akLDLQPSfIH0qG9ztS+9x7daZawxEgwPQ2OAUsA+9VQyKGC4/t1 w9RvFIMTi/NSLhj76SVnlTZtGQgMkOe//vFFrXusjTmO6bpYa07MyfA/YJshVg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1729288161; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=XW/A0nJki5YcX5WC3DWS1Neep22TGxvLkdp8pDiWv4Y=; b=/7x9dyYAu62KOuqT5A8CjWaGoDFs+oNaHQeqp1xus/8bKzOMdgR8EQFCqYTouD8UsOGljM /8+aUTlmOOaJS5Aw== To: Frederic Weisbecker Cc: LKML , Anna-Maria Behnsen , John Stultz , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Stephen Boyd , Eric Biederman , Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: [patch V5 01/26] signal: Confine POSIX_TIMERS properly In-Reply-To: References: <20241001083138.922192481@linutronix.de> <20241001083835.314100569@linutronix.de> Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 23:49:21 +0200 Message-ID: <87bjzh84ke.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 18 2024 at 14:50, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > Le Tue, Oct 01, 2024 at 10:42:00AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner a =C3=A9crit : >> From: Thomas Gleixner >>=20 >> Move the itimer rearming out of the signal code and consolidate all posix >> timer related functions in the signal code under one ifdef. >>=20 >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner >> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) > > I assume nothing has changed on this one? If so I reiterate: > > Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker Sorry, I somehow missed to pick up the tags.