From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C528F7C6EB; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 22:27:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718836041; cv=none; b=JvjqRDkpaPYW2dSR+/AGKfbZEblIvO67QaKU+UENmEdW1wo3iazb5Wb5rZsM7BreWDJ+osaH2+fnwjrpwSSTVoJ6oNuZ+ZP23iJ7ALlnKfz7YjZmokSvhnb696ZUqlL2b0VPzN1u1scZZHRZTfaIKAEZKtJ+pLHtkP9Yxqc6/m8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718836041; c=relaxed/simple; bh=LcjFPAmv3ZgcopZ3asT6Wbl3AYdzxqSF8MieOtxMDoY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E+INiYqNGUNpPUnKZN4qTtOK+VRnumn/KuT5yZBkNbsjkltSARfkqWa15VYYbkTiybNykktWJ64HEs8Pb4sQMFWaNzkFWzvZPm1x+Pktt8L7QTYUIyHQZRrgrzdOdnYB7VtZTnmiDD2Ww/EveWfN+mUFLhHNwI7UPG54nWduNBA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=EmOWQYDw; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ufGS/fHL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="EmOWQYDw"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ufGS/fHL" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1718836037; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Np4GRDxBROgfQOBaAEEl5F0XDhVrQ/pacI5wmlASWvg=; b=EmOWQYDwz1Oc6mYYBtiGixRa9Wj+njMg0v/RvyAyCCCQL4dz3ZB5soAKfcvAUbHP2uBU9/ i+cjm8ZK9QtLZaAnVy5R3LutdhYzEUq4x7AQE6IVKAIH0YdOO8N0ZMhljzOkAl6pvfC2PK D7zcOkJcII5tbBg+QsVdwxrYo+9Ll5a5Ed0smbWUKZzaUIO8Vtb/WEl8yUTMrLU+x9D4h/ kTDld0ptPKYvifKNkBUqaW6bnQerBxIUeCSi22WIauLOzrB9IKFeOv51z6e842h5kevlDn 6rWOBv75+xmMgpAs4aXq0eDbEBoxE7BGYUi46M/SMxI1bTSguhXi1Sba62RmcQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1718836037; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Np4GRDxBROgfQOBaAEEl5F0XDhVrQ/pacI5wmlASWvg=; b=ufGS/fHLtO3APwyHEFUa0lk7dNe923RdycRqiWibJ3tyUfEnesa9RA4oVPTHg0zZu05Fs7 7fGLvtxQ0IA0AUDQ== To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Tejun Heo , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@kernel.org, joshdon@google.com, brho@google.com, pjt@google.com, derkling@google.com, haoluo@google.com, dvernet@meta.com, dschatzberg@meta.com, dskarlat@cs.cmu.edu, riel@surriel.com, changwoo@igalia.com, himadrics@inria.fr, memxor@gmail.com, andrea.righi@canonical.com, joel@joelfernandes.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v6] sched: Implement BPF extensible scheduler class In-Reply-To: References: <87ed8sps71.ffs@tglx> Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 00:27:16 +0200 Message-ID: <87bk3wpnzv.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Linus! On Wed, Jun 19 2024 at 15:10, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jun 2024 at 13:56, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> So instead of "solving" this brute force and thereby proliferating the >> non-constructive situation, can you please hold off with that plan to >> merge it as is and give us three month to get this onto a collaborative >> and constructive track? > > The thing is, I have seen absolutely _nothing_ in the last 9 months or > so. Right, but that applies to both sides, no? > So to me, "three more months" sounds like just delay. Three months delay are well worth to give it try, but that's your decision. Thanks, Thomas