From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@google.com>,
Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ntp: remove accidental integer wrap-around
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 14:44:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk4ve5wc.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ed9re7i4.ffs@tglx>
On Fri, May 24 2024 at 14:09, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, May 17 2024 at 20:22, Justin Stitt wrote:
> I dug into history to find a Fixes tag. That unearthed something
> interesting. Exactly this check used to be there until commit
> eea83d896e31 ("ntp: NTP4 user space bits update") which landed in
> 2.6.30. The change log says:
>
> "If some values for adjtimex() are outside the acceptable range, they
> are now simply normalized instead of letting the syscall fail."
>
> The problem with that commit is that it did not do any normalization at
> all and just relied on the actual time_maxerror handling in
> second_overflow(), which is both insufficient and also prone to that
> overflow issue.
>
> So instead of turning the clock back, we might be better off to actually
> put the normalization in place at the assignment:
>
> time_maxerror = min(max(0, txc->maxerror), NTP_PHASE_LIMIT);
>
> or something like that.
So that commit also removed the sanity check for time_esterror, but
that's not doing anything in the kernel other than being reset in
clear_ntp() and being handed back to user space. No idea what this is
actually used for.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-24 12:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-17 20:22 [PATCH v2] ntp: remove accidental integer wrap-around Justin Stitt
2024-05-24 12:09 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 12:44 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-05-27 8:26 ` Miroslav Lichvar
2024-05-29 8:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-05-24 22:43 ` Justin Stitt
2024-05-24 22:54 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-08-05 14:22 ` [tip: timers/urgent] ntp: Clamp maxerror and esterror to operating range tip-bot2 for Justin Stitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bk4ve5wc.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=justinstitt@google.com \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox