public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: esben@geanix.com
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	 "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	 Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
	Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@st.com>,
	 Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
	 netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Add time-based-scheduling property
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 10:10:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bk99hj7q.fsf@geanix.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240124-reptilian-icing-a95b20f123be@spud> (Conor Dooley's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2024 16:07:48 +0000")

Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org> writes:

> On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 03:33:06PM +0100, Esben Haabendal wrote:
>> Time Based Scheduling can be enabled per TX queue, if supported by the
>> controller.
>
> If time based scheduling is not supported by the controller, then the
> property should not be present! The presence of a property like this
> should mean that the feature is supported, using it is up to the
> operating system.
>
> That said, why is this a property that should be in DT?

It is added to the tx-queues-config object of snps,dwmac bindings. This
entire object is about configuration of the ethernet controller, which
is also what the purpose of the snps,time-based-scheduling.
So yes, it is not specifically about describing what the hardware is
capable of, but how the hardware is configured. It is a continuation of
the current driver design.

> If support is per controller is it not sufficient to use the
> compatible to determine if this is supported?

Are you suggesting to include the mapping from all supported compatible
controllers to which TX queues supports TBS in the driver code?  What
would the benefit of that compared to describing it explicitly in the
binding?
And for the purpose of the above question, I am talking about it as if
the binding was describing the hardware capability and not the
configuration.

/Esben


>> Signed-off-by: Esben Haabendal <esben@geanix.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml | 6 ++++++
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> 
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>> index 5c2769dc689a..301e9150ecc3 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/snps,dwmac.yaml
>> @@ -399,6 +399,12 @@ properties:
>>              type: boolean
>>              description: TX checksum offload is unsupported by the TX queue.
>>  
>> +          snps,time-based-scheduling:
>> +            type: boolean
>> +            description:
>> +              Time Based Scheduling will be enabled for TX queue.
>> +              This is typically not supported for TX queue 0.
>> +
>>          allOf:
>>            - if:
>>                required:
>> -- 
>> 2.43.0
>> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-01-25  9:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-24 14:32 [PATCH 1/3] net: stmmac: do not clear TBS enable bit on link up/down Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] dt-bindings: net: snps,dwmac: Add time-based-scheduling property Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 16:07   ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-25  9:10     ` esben [this message]
2024-01-25  9:19       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-01-25 11:55         ` esben
2024-01-25 17:14           ` Conor Dooley
2024-01-30 21:39   ` Rob Herring
2024-01-31  7:31     ` Esben Haabendal
2024-01-24 14:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] net: stmmac: Time Based Scheduling support for OF platforms Esben Haabendal
2024-01-25 11:03   ` Kurt Kanzenbach
2024-01-25 11:58     ` esben

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87bk99hj7q.fsf@geanix.com \
    --to=esben@geanix.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=conor@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=peppe.cavallaro@st.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox