Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/tests: Change "igt_" prefix to "test_drm_"

Maíra Canal
2022-09-01T22:33:34Z

Hi Maxime,

On 9/1/22 09:55, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 09:42:10AM -0300, Maíra Canal wrote:
>> With the introduction of KUnit, IGT is no longer the only option to run
>> the DRM unit tests, as the tests can be run through kunit-tool or on
>> real hardware with CONFIG_KUNIT.
>>
>> Therefore, remove the "igt_" prefix from the tests and replace it with
>> the "test_drm_" prefix, making the tests' names independent from the tool
>> used.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Maíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
>>
>> ---
>> v1 -> v2: https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20220830211603.191734-1-mairacanal@riseup.net/
>> - Change "drm_" prefix to "test_drm_", as "drm_" can be a bit confusing (Jani Nikula).
>
> I appreciate it's a bit of a bikeshed but I disagree with this. The
> majority of the kunit tests already out there start with the framework
> name, including *all* the examples in the kunit doc. Plus, it's fairly
> obvious that it's a test, kunit is only about running tests in the first
> place.

Would it be better to keep it as "drm_"?

Currently, I don't think it is appropriate to hold the "igt_" prefix, as
the tests are not IGT exclusive, but I don't have a strong opinion on
using the "drm_" or the "test_drm" prefixes.

Best Regards,
- Maíra Canal

>
> Maxime
>