From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: geert@linux-m68k.org, vverma@digitalocean.com, hdanton@sina.com,
hch@infradead.org, stefanha@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com,
mst@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
christian.brauner@ubuntu.com, axboe@kernel.dk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 10/10] vhost: use user_worker to check RLIMITs
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:01:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bl1fcaxs.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211129194707.5863-11-michael.christie@oracle.com> (Mike Christie's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2021 13:47:07 -0600")
Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com> writes:
> For vhost workers we use the kthread API which inherit's its values from
> and checks against the kthreadd thread. This results in the wrong RLIMITs
> being checked. This patch has us use the user_worker helpers which will
> inherit its values/checks from the thread that owns the device similar to
> if we did a clone in userspace.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 65 +++++++++++++++----------------------------
> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 7 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> index c9a1f706989c..8cf259d798c0 100644
> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> -#include <linux/cgroup.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/sort.h>
> #include <linux/sched/mm.h>
> @@ -344,17 +343,14 @@ static void vhost_vq_reset(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> {
> struct vhost_worker *worker = data;
> - struct vhost_dev *dev = worker->dev;
> struct vhost_work *work, *work_next;
> struct llist_node *node;
>
> - kthread_use_mm(dev->mm);
> -
> for (;;) {
> /* mb paired w/ kthread_stop */
> set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
>
> - if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> + if (test_bit(VHOST_WORKER_FLAG_STOP, &worker->flags)) {
> __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
> break;
> }
> @@ -376,8 +372,9 @@ static int vhost_worker(void *data)
> schedule();
> }
> }
> - kthread_unuse_mm(dev->mm);
> - return 0;
> +
> + complete(worker->exit_done);
> + do_exit(0);
This code worries me.
It has the potential for a caller to do:
vhost_worker_stop()
module_put();
Then the exiting work thread tries to do:
do_exit()
Except the code that calls do_exit has already been removed from the
kernel. Maybe the vhost code can never be removed from the kernel
but otherwise I expect that is possible.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-17 19:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-29 19:46 [PATCH V6 01/10] Use copy_process in vhost layer Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:46 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] fork: Make IO worker options flag based Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:46 ` [PATCH V6 02/10] fork/vm: Move common PF_IO_WORKER behavior to new flag Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 03/10] fork: add USER_WORKER flag to not dup/clone files Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 04/10] fork: Add USER_WORKER flag to ignore signals Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 05/10] signal: Perfom autoreap for PF_USER_WORKER Mike Christie
2021-12-17 18:42 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 06/10] fork: add helpers to clone a process for kernel use Mike Christie
2021-12-17 18:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 07/10] io_uring: switch to user_worker Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 08/10] fork: remove create_io_thread Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 09/10] vhost: move worker thread fields to new struct Mike Christie
2021-11-29 19:47 ` [PATCH V6 10/10] vhost: use user_worker to check RLIMITs Mike Christie
2021-12-17 19:01 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2021-12-08 20:34 ` [PATCH V6 01/10] Use copy_process in vhost layer Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-12-08 22:13 ` michael.christie
2021-12-09 9:32 ` Christian Brauner
2021-12-17 19:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-12-17 22:08 ` michael.christie
2021-12-22 0:20 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-12-22 17:32 ` Mike Christie
2021-12-22 18:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2021-12-22 20:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-01-17 16:41 ` Mike Christie
2022-01-17 17:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-01-18 18:51 ` Mike Christie
2022-01-18 19:00 ` Mike Christie
2022-01-18 19:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2022-02-02 21:02 ` Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bl1fcaxs.fsf@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vverma@digitalocean.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox