Re: [RFC][PATCH] task_struct::state frobbing

[Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>]

On Thu, Mar 25 2021 at 19:11, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -3867,7 +3867,7 @@ static bool blk_mq_poll_hybrid(struct request_queue *q,
>  int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>  {
>  	struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx;
> -	long state;
> +	unsigned int state;
>  
>  	if (!blk_qc_t_valid(cookie) ||
>  	    !test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_POLL, &q->queue_flags))
> @@ -3891,7 +3891,7 @@ int blk_poll(struct request_queue *q, blk_qc_t cookie, bool spin)
>  
>  	hctx->poll_considered++;
>  
> -	state = current->state;
> +	state = READ_ONCE(current->__state);

Can we please have get_current_state() for that?

>  static bool io_wq_worker_affinity(struct io_worker *worker, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct task_struct *task = worker->task;
> -	struct rq_flags rf;
> -	struct rq *rq;
> -
> -	rq = task_rq_lock(task, &rf);
> -	do_set_cpus_allowed(task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));
> -	task->flags |= PF_NO_SETAFFINITY;
> -	task_rq_unlock(rq, task, &rf);
> +	set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, cpumask_of_node(worker->wqe->node));

Duh, I thought we got all of them by now.

Thanks,

        tglx