From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init, fix initcall blacklist for modules
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:59:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bn34ls9w.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1465820959-13808-1-git-send-email-prarit@redhat.com> (Prarit Bhargava's message of "Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:29:19 -0400")
On Mon, Jun 13 2016, Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com> wrote:
> Sorry ... forgot to cc everyone on the last email.
>
> P.
>
> ----8<----
>
> sprint_symbol_no_offset() returns the string "function_name [module_name]"
> where [module_name] is not printed for built in kernel functions. This
> means that the initcall blacklisting code will now always fail when
I was and am pretty sure that %pf ends up using
sprint_symbol_no_offset(), so I don't see how this is new. But maybe
"now" doesn't refer to c8cdd2be21?
> comparing module_init() function names. This patch resolves the issue by
> comparing to the length of the function_name.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Cc: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
> Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Yaowei Bai <baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> init/main.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/init/main.c b/init/main.c
> index 4c17fda5c2ff..09a795e91efe 100644
> --- a/init/main.c
> +++ b/init/main.c
> @@ -708,14 +708,26 @@ static bool __init_or_module initcall_blacklisted(initcall_t fn)
> {
> struct blacklist_entry *entry;
> char fn_name[KSYM_SYMBOL_LEN];
> + char *space;
> + int length;
>
> if (list_empty(&blacklisted_initcalls))
> return false;
>
> sprint_symbol_no_offset(fn_name, (unsigned long)fn);
> + /*
> + * fn will be "function_name [module_name]" where [module_name] is not
> + * displayed for built-in initcall functions. Strip off the
> + * [module_name].
> + */
> + space = strchrnul(fn_name, ' ');
> + if (!space)
> + length = strlen(fn_name);
> + else
> + length = space - fn_name;
strchrnul never returns NULL, so this could just be 'length =
strchrnul(fn_name, ' ') - fn_name;'. But I don't think that's what you
want anyway: Suppose one has blacklisted "init_foobar", and the function
pointer resolves to a completely unrelated "init_foo", we'll end up
falsely also blacklisting that since we're just comparing prefixes.
May I suggest
strreplace(fn_name, ' ', '\0');
which also seems to match the comment a little better (and eliminates
the extra variables and the hunk below).
> list_for_each_entry(entry, &blacklisted_initcalls, next) {
> - if (!strcmp(fn_name, entry->buf)) {
> + if (!strncmp(fn_name, entry->buf, length)) {
> pr_debug("initcall %s blacklisted\n", fn_name);
> return true;
> }
Rasmus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-13 20:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 12:29 [PATCH] init, fix initcall blacklist for modules Prarit Bhargava
2016-06-13 20:59 ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2016-06-14 9:59 ` Prarit Bhargava
2016-06-14 22:31 ` Andrew Morton
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-13 12:27 Prarit Bhargava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bn34ls9w.fsf@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aryabinin@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=baiyaowei@cmss.chinamobile.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox