From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Vincent Guittot
<public-vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@plane.gmane.org>
Cc: public-linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@plane.gmane.org,
public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org,
public-linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@plane.gmane.org,
public-devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@plane.gmane.org,
public-a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@plane.gmane.org,
public-rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@plane.gmane.org,
public-linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@plane.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 09:54:31 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bokehkfs.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1340094536-20873-3-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (Vincent Guittot's message of "Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:28:53 +0200")
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 10:28:53 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> This factorization has also been proposed in another patchset that has not been
> merged yet:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2012-January/080873.html
> So, this patch could be dropped depending of the state of the other one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
> ---
> arch/arm/kernel/topology.c | 47 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> index 37e2e57..92c2fb3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -82,6 +82,31 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu)
> return &cpu_topology[cpu].core_sibling;
> }
>
> +void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpuid)
> +{
> + struct cputopo_arm *cpu_topo, *cpuid_topo = &cpu_topology[cpuid];
> + int cpu;
> + /* update core and thread sibling masks */
> + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> + cpu_topo = &cpu_topology[cpu];
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->socket_id == cpu_topo->socket_id) {
I think this will make the code a little bit cleaner:
if (cpuid_topo->socket_id != cpu_topo->socket_id)
continue;
Thanks,
Namhyung
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid, &cpu_topo->core_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpuid_topo->core_sibling);
> +
> + if (cpuid_topo->core_id == cpu_topo->core_id) {
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpuid,
> + &cpu_topo->thread_sibling);
> + if (cpu != cpuid)
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu,
> + &cpuid_topo->thread_sibling);
> + }
> + }
> + }
> + smp_wmb();
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-20 5:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-19 8:28 [PATCH v2 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ARM: topology: Add arch_scale_freq_power function Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <87fw9qhkl9.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
2012-06-20 9:04 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ARM: topology: factorize the update of sibling masks Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 0:54 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information Vincent Guittot
[not found] ` <877gv2hjhb.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com>
2012-06-20 8:43 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] sched, x86: Remove broken power estimation Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 8:28 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] sched: cpu_power: enable ARCH_POWER Vincent Guittot
2012-06-19 9:01 ` Yong Zhang
2012-06-20 9:11 ` Vincent Guittot
2012-06-20 9:19 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bokehkfs.fsf@sejong.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=public-a.p.zijlstra-/NLkJaSkS4VmR6Xm/wNWPw@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linaro-dev-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-rob.herring-bsGFqQB8/DxBDgjK7y7TUQ@plane.gmane.org \
--cc=public-vincent.guittot-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@plane.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox