From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755553Ab1J3JEz (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:04:55 -0400 Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.1]:53206 "EHLO smtp1-g21.free.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754473Ab1J3JEy (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Oct 2011 05:04:54 -0400 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Marek Vasut Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, dwmw2@infradead.org, dedekind1@gmail.com, mikedunn@newsguy.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/13] DocG3 fixes and write support References: <1319824292-11085-1-git-send-email-robert.jarzmik@free.fr> <201110300241.39534.marek.vasut@gmail.com> X-URL: http://belgarath.falguerolles.org/ Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2011 10:04:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <201110300241.39534.marek.vasut@gmail.com> (Marek Vasut's message of "Sun, 30 Oct 2011 02:41:39 +0200") Message-ID: <87bosy6eab.fsf@free.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Marek Vasut writes: > Hi, > > can you sum up the situation about the another (docg4) driver for us not > watching this too tightly? Was there any improvement/progress/... ? The review is underway, my comments should be dealt with, and a V2 of the patch should be sent. It's not in my hands. The global view we have with Mike is that chips are different, and each one deserves its own driver. Several registers are common, and the docg3.h could become common. Cheers. -- Robert