public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-irq@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] genirq/matrix: Clarify CPU selection logic
Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2026 12:11:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy2u9els.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260128031406.9473-2-zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>

On Wed, Jan 28 2026 at 11:14, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> The CPU selection loops in matrix_find_best_cpu() and
> matrix_find_best_cpu_managed() mix the online check with the
> comparison that determines whether a CPU becomes the current
> best candidate.

What's wrong about that?

> Restructure the loops to filter out offline CPUs first and then
> perform the comparison separately. This makes the selection
> criteria easier to read and reason about.

It's just different and not any better. We are not reshuffling perfectly
correct code just to accomodate with personal taste of someone.

Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-28 11:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-27  2:41 [PATCH v2] genirq/matrix: Clarify CPU selection logic Zhan Xusheng
2026-01-27  8:37 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-01-28  3:14   ` [PATCH v3 0/2] genirq/matrix: CPU selection cleanup and tie-breaking fix Zhan Xusheng
2026-01-28  3:14     ` [PATCH v3 1/2] genirq/matrix: Clarify CPU selection logic Zhan Xusheng
2026-01-28 11:11       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2026-01-28  3:14     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] genirq/matrix: Avoid implicit tie-breaking by CPU iteration order Zhan Xusheng
2026-01-28 11:16       ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cy2u9els.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-irq@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox