From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.133.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B179231A550 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 11:09:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757502570; cv=none; b=V79pZ3VV5JiJHnj5erpMcaLEZfC/6pMfi7sGPRm86qmhmwJjJqyEOomvdMD7LtHEeWIGA5Nk+9Lrr5+oz+bcUYZGhrWA7XES2F/pwBQQZAa+i2phtJnZ5ZzldCr+LO25FgjitSNOrewaNk7mc+K/Xkt5j9PSRQA1jiISmyTQuGs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757502570; c=relaxed/simple; bh=BQ2XtYRwei+F/8LMUKBdKEm+z8pxUaNiGAkH40rNEKc=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BDFymAN28NP85Wn3FyCjKBhPxUoU5+2t8fWUPTjBIJn6nGBLAjTrA8iy+XuiB/hCUaNBXOSOW2wouIaZZwaY6zkiaC4dVuPxkk9obPVSEHbMKDa0g6XvUKkRkEIs7WOGr3wYwT8BF9GVQTtmzhAaREXdp4RXUOUzQAIIY+YdV08= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=e5FYc8ld; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.133.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="e5FYc8ld" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1757502567; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=EEfKAAgF77B0N35cHlVCZR8H3qoPVBq2FQNy2mJIamk=; b=e5FYc8ldR7PPsH5vOcJ5DT3Ww9LNNW9YV4bar2Rql4ltUim3s+ALQGexwwKQmLYhaS4512 0m9Q5uT8uYpGsgSf2WT9/C79qG88J1a0UWJcRO/OUMXdQXRxet3IEg+hSj5EwXJpZ1dZQF 5mArQFaLfyIv5ttnfBHtw2/Fc8iKNLI= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-354-_KbLgDXxOf2TV1oC3L-i0g-1; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 07:09:26 -0400 X-MC-Unique: _KbLgDXxOf2TV1oC3L-i0g-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: _KbLgDXxOf2TV1oC3L-i0g_1757502564 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-45b467f5173so47610075e9.3 for ; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:26 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1757502563; x=1758107363; h=mime-version:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to :from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=EEfKAAgF77B0N35cHlVCZR8H3qoPVBq2FQNy2mJIamk=; b=B0Kv4kUabVMs8FbRn4LaMkQLRyK0OMaOjXCdi0jSd+SOslC2KG2ez//Afu/p6QEJNt xfVMT0mYpv2bNNb8E4uJflNgsOegoOE8EoGHjgxzIwaBd7MlBJxaHpXaCyuR2Lun1OLt XqVQVyVxA4ECpsIMO/X4bpUQtie9hc7m5UouZ75hH8IZXtnKk68xklZcUbdemyE0PmPO kIZiOzVfLZAfWBv2f68XsReKFuS8a/9wGKYU95KxWu2KPKpi9Eelj/F1jPrxF88Sc0Yk V9mIpH1+ur2chijDao9P6jv9M+UciR7EBLiZCX5FqTwiNN1IhXiIkMQ7NcJNJEkzgbsK ZOaQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCURH+f/OsIqVGslYt1JcpseFLRn/niiJ0/h6bFHsMg9ewTYiyIObs3E/zJ281ZevVy6hRc9gw3WtIwyDdA=@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzYLfevXCUd60KoK6PBF/VriCJ/G8rG9Y+pPeaOVTybSNjbFfHW AYQgc1v812Ki1RIE4ZiOjg9QDCV5V9c/egju9Ka87NnnKHzVBzUK+55xLTs8NDv915JySXq0zvC OnK+1Zt1C9Bolbkeeip6wcsjOijhVB2rzQY+3EEzfxGJybYTDJLL5LKzEr4T2K4HSyA== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuCJHfWIRnrKHGWiz5jk9masPBAklh6v7ziKGOWiWlybmy2peDWy6REnV7Cn+w 0g86PnkO/QIzjl+zkfqm3LU+xS9btrToW3lLfvUwD2TKAPEjaTOVpB4WG5TUcQvUO39VFoX8jpJ /Ql13J8odq/57f8wA6xrHJq+eM5xQ9qklxeNlv20K3eu0kbWkmlfJ6f8TdfbxXecFr1NY/PgBfD In6KtjCWiVwY1sJe2j6gg980kDkN0bv1yLag6mP9VcF8QqLWvlt0NPue22Nn/LwBkXFqZwOxpZe 9UPZlZu0fE/I4GLhlLAlxWFxo9KcDZ/Z2UrfVzkI3sRVOVF80x40s67bbOPgMzIN5M4PxxUTLeu XdCITgGAabhCfp2QQ12nZqQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2889:b0:3e5:50:e044 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3e643555859mr13543070f8f.45.1757502563451; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtsE6TP99LwCM9DefOr4NgVBIR7vSn0IU371t63+HnR3UaFYs5LDu32sAvz1H1Dto10pgN1g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2889:b0:3e5:50:e044 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3e643555859mr13543046f8f.45.1757502563021; Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (62-151-111-63.jazzfree.ya.com. [62.151.111.63]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-45df1ba282dsm26332925e9.5.2025.09.10.04.09.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 10 Sep 2025 04:09:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Javier Martinez Canillas To: Brett A C Sheffield Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Simona Vetter , Helge Deller , Thomas Zimmermann , Lee Jones , Murad Masimov , Yongzhen Zhang , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Revert "fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when removing conflicting FBs" In-Reply-To: References: <20250910095124.6213-3-bacs@librecast.net> <20250910095124.6213-5-bacs@librecast.net> <87frcuegb7.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 13:09:20 +0200 Message-ID: <87cy7yef8f.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Brett A C Sheffield writes: > On 2025-09-10 12:46, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> Brett A C Sheffield writes: >> >> Hello Brett, >> >> > This reverts commit 13d28e0c79cbf69fc6f145767af66905586c1249. >> > >> > Commit ee7a69aa38d8 ("fbdev: Disable sysfb device registration when >> > removing conflicting FBs") was backported to 5.15.y LTS. This causes a >> > regression where all virtual consoles stop responding during boot at: >> > >> > "Populating /dev with existing devices through uevents ..." >> > >> > Reverting the commit fixes the regression. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Brett A C Sheffield >> > --- >> >> In the other email you said: >> >> > Newer stable kernels with this >> > patch (6.1.y, 6.6.y, 6.12,y, 6.15.y, 6.16.y) and mainline are unaffected. >> >> But are you proposing to revert the mentioned commit in mainline too >> or just in the 5.15.y LTS tree ? > > Only the 5.15.y tree. Sorry - that could have been clearer. There's no > regression anywhere else. Mainline and other stable kernels are all ok. > That's what I thought but just wanted to confirm that was the case. Thanks! > Cheers, > > > Brett > -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Core Platforms Red Hat