The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Jirka Hladky <jhladky@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	john.stultz@linaro.org, anna-maria@linutronix.de
Cc: Philip Auld <pauld@redhat.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Luis Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>,
	Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>,
	Luke Yang <luyang@redhat.com>, Jan Jurca <jjurca@redhat.com>,
	Joe Mario <jmario@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] 76% performance loss in timer workloads caused by 513793bc6ab3 "posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent"
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 09:14:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cy8j3ma5.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sehh2gw8.ffs@tglx>

On Sun, Aug 24 2025 at 11:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 16 2025 at 18:38, Jirka Hladky wrote:
> And this has nothing to do with timer migration or whatever, that's just
> a matter of correctness.

Just to come back to timer migration. That's completely irrelevant here
because /proc/sys/kernel/timer_migration only affects the timer wheel
and _not_ hrtimers, which are used here.

And just a few more comments about your findings:

> grep -c hrtimer_start hrtimer*txt
> 6.12: 10898132
> 6.13: 17105314
> 
> grep -c hrtimer_expire_entry hrtimer-6.12.0-33.el10.x86_64.txt
> hrtimer-6.13.0-0.rc2.22.eln144.x86_64.txt
> 6.12: 8358469
> 6.13: 3476757
> 
> The number of timers started increased significantly in 6.13, but most
> timers do not expire. Completion rate went down from 76% to 20%

Did you actually look _which_ timers were started and which ones did
expire and which ones not?

Data for a 2 seconds run (couldn't be bothered to wait 23 seconds)

On 6.10:

All start/expire:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start' t.txt 
248039
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire' t.txt 
247530

stress-ng Posix timer related:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start.*function=posix_timer_fn' t.txt 
246739
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire.*function=posix_timer_fn' t.txt 
246739

stress-ng nanosleep related:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start.*function=hrtimer_wakeup' t.txt 
2
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire.*function=hrtimer_wakeup' t.txt 
2

On 6.17-rc1:

All start/expire:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start' t.txt 
457456
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire' t.txt 
304959

stress-ng Posix timer related:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start.*function=posix_timer_fn' t.txt 
304673
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire.*function=posix_timer_fn' t.txt 
304674

stress-ng nanosleep related:

# grep -c 'hrtimer_start.*function=hrtimer_wakeup' t.txt 
152241
# grep -c 'hrtimer_expire.*function=hrtimer_wakeup' t.txt 
1

The 150k timers which do not expire are related to the restarted
nanosleep(), because the nanosleep is canceled due to the signal and has
to be re-started.

On 6.10 that does not even reach the nanosleep in the test thread
because the thing is too busy with bogus signal handling.

Trace for 6.10

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938505: sys_timer_settime(timer_id: 0, flags: 0, new_setting: 7f7880228ec0, old_setting: 0)
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d..2.   187.938505: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=0000000023e2c3e0 function=posix_timer_fn expires=186716941003 softexpires=186716941003 mode=ABS

Signal handler re-arms the timer

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938505: sys_timer_settime -> 0x0
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938506: sys_rt_sigreturn()

Returns from signal handler

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d..1.   187.938506: posixtimer_rearm <-dequeue_signal

Dequeues the signal which was related to the arming _before_ the signal
handler re-arms it. So it's incorrectly delivered.

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d.h..   187.938507: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=0000000023e2c3e0 function=posix_timer_fn now=186716941468

Now the timer which was armed in the signal handler above expires

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938507: sys_timer_getoverrun(timer_id: 0)
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938507: sys_timer_getoverrun -> 0x0

While the signal handler handles the bogus left over signal

Lather, rinse and repeat.

 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938508: sys_timer_settime(timer_id: 0, flags: 0, new_setting: 7f7880228ec0, old_setting: 0)
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d..2.   187.938508: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=0000000023e2c3e0 function=posix_timer_fn expires=186716943483 softexpires=186716943483 mode=ABS
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938508: sys_timer_settime -> 0x0
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] .....   187.938508: sys_rt_sigreturn()
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d..1.   187.938508: posixtimer_rearm <-dequeue_signal
 stress-ng-timer-2229    [110] d.h..   187.938509: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=0000000023e2c3e0 function=posix_timer_fn now=186716943952

vs. 6.17

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089978: sys_rt_sigreturn()
 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..1.    84.089979: posixtimer_deliver_signal <-dequeue_signal

Signal, which was generated by the original armed timer is correctly ignored

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..1.    84.089979: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=0000000081582a37 function=hrtimer_wakeup expires=83144889279 softexpires=83144839279 mode=REL

Nanosleep is restarted

          <idle>-0       [029] d.h1.    84.089980: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=000000009e0c5084 function=posix_timer_fn now=83134840265

Timer which was armed in the signal handler expires

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..1.    84.089981: posixtimer_deliver_signal <-dequeue_signal

Signal is delivered and timer is re-armed:

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..2.    84.089981: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=000000009e0c5084 function=posix_timer_fn expires=83134842396 softexpires=83134842396 mode=ABS

Signal is handled

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089982: sys_timer_getoverrun(timer_id: 0)
 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089982: sys_timer_getoverrun -> 0x2
 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d.h..    84.089983: hrtimer_expire_entry: hrtimer=000000009e0c5084 function=posix_timer_fn now=83134842856

Re-armed timer expires and queues a signal

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089983: sys_timer_settime(timer_id: 0, flags: 0, new_setting: 7f7cccf7dec0, old_setting: 0)

Timer is re-armed

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..2.    84.089983: hrtimer_start: hrtimer=000000009e0c5084 function=posix_timer_fn expires=83134844444 softexpires=83134844444 mode=ABS
 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089983: sys_timer_settime -> 0x0
 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] .....    84.089983: sys_rt_sigreturn()

Signal, which was generated by the timer armed on signal dequeue is
correctly ignored

 stress-ng-timer-1828    [029] d..1.    84.089984: posixtimer_deliver_signal <-dequeue_signal


Thanks,

        tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-25  7:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-16 16:38 [REGRESSION] 76% performance loss in timer workloads caused by 513793bc6ab3 "posix-timers: Make signal delivery consistent" Jirka Hladky
2025-08-24  9:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-08-25  7:14   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-08-25 11:35     ` Jirka Hladky
2025-08-25 20:04       ` Jirka Hladky

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87cy8j3ma5.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jhladky@redhat.com \
    --cc=jjurca@redhat.com \
    --cc=jmario@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luyang@redhat.com \
    --cc=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=pauld@redhat.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox