From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54E4F14EC47; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 22:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729116034; cv=none; b=hKXOJ9nrx/KahvhI0VOGtpm4ovVE8kxJchmGYH01uyQKSQ8Axl04pbgfyZ62zpl4yNMMzgI0siJc2SeiiiVY9Zx4UAV7SJJUGe0tvAqqdDEw6khDX7GMbRXvMy7hJGE4MZ6hfcHqbyd5w7hVScZt2TUovvDQmT7MoI3GRvXdkZU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729116034; c=relaxed/simple; bh=yl1F6BzOPZEQ03ekfz6crqlH1mqvRN6+fW0z4mNfXEM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ljHSCrFTQvbwP4imaKr74hXjo7ECmWmnHsfYvn8baMbYnVfZY7e2Qs5JsMuu/BTSxFECV//lZ2oqERoyg27qPArrOJO40gOQgcie5we0oORsiejXXLPG4OU2gfnWHUFFKz+1AcnNaU5NDV6WxuqwooIA8TOPsQe7jNXuYanpAuw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=C+p5po82; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=aGfZF+uW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="C+p5po82"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="aGfZF+uW" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1729116031; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vhf8iOfPlNIrpxB6coA1JKEPQMoCR9lDm2Uzc0nNue0=; b=C+p5po82ZftR+wAkoYIxfhg4jmOwez76sav0tQzEYqcZ5kLC39vUHWtZ3UKztF+p10fuDU 0yI1DFlAboaJuO0Jma7f1E6ib1rP0LOaPPVf6vh33oyzuqW+muKp1hiisKHba+GZcny9h7 iY4wzrvEeCHGhNv9ql18Xdv3G/0/DWC3wbLXx6LZkMVKVc5H4hN6TSs9RNtcF1ykHrJfjk WiIsHw/Mg8hccDrTTihb687jVNkRu5DPROFJ4xSByLc7sXSbjZjmqR6y7jLwvZvZz0EONN eOq/ReI5WOyG37MO2nB6YuRzNFS8+gBorNcJTCM4APCbAf6ApCMKLQxrGDgedA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1729116031; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Vhf8iOfPlNIrpxB6coA1JKEPQMoCR9lDm2Uzc0nNue0=; b=aGfZF+uWID7vnA57nFHlYeeyWNm7Fq823AmcaWQv593ZJmCTk9SUou2i+/ST1P3bK1VIBJ jsmX+MNJdKtW5lAg== To: Markus Elfring , Fabrizio Castro , linux-renesas-soc@vger.kernel.org, Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Biju Das , Chris Paterson , Lad Prabhakar , Marc Zyngier , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [v4] irqchip/renesas-rzg2l: Fix missing put_device In-Reply-To: <692cabd4-038b-403a-b21e-69a2b0492e57@web.de> References: <20241011172003.1242841-1-fabrizio.castro.jz@renesas.com> <663a37fe-ffc4-4826-b8ba-bcefdb0e7992@web.de> <871q0hdofq.ffs@tglx> <692cabd4-038b-403a-b21e-69a2b0492e57@web.de> Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 00:00:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87cyjzaetd.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Oct 16 2024 at 11:38, Markus Elfring wrote: >> But this change fixes a bug and that's it. > > Maybe. Maybe? There is no maybe. You clearly failed to read and understand the documentation I asked you to read and understand. Either you are impersonating a badly implemented LLM or you are actually living in the delusion that you can teach people who are actually doing work based on your particular flavor of hubris. Your answer to this mail will clearly tell me into which category you fall into, but neither of them are in any way useful to the Linux kernel community. Whatever the answer is, I don't care because your input is completely irrelevant. You have proven that over the years. Thanks, tglx