From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Todd Brandt <todd.e.brandt@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: Reduce unnecessary wait times by pr_flush()
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 13:44:38 +0206 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87cyxmso5d.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZSUPBiTXY486H1FV@alley>
On 2023-10-10, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> wrote:
>> This is an updated version of the patch
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230929113233.863824-1-john.ogness@linutronix.de
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>>
>> + Split reduction of the pooling time into separate patch.
>> + Use jiffies to count the real sleeping time.
>>
>> Note that my original POC counted jiffies spent in the entire cycle.
>> It would count also the time spent by console_lock() and by flushing
>> the legacy consoles in console_unlock().
>>
>> The current version counts only the time spent by msleep(1) aka
>> the pooling interval.
>>
>>
>> John Ogness (1):
>> printk: flush consoles before checking progress
>>
>> Petr Mladek (1):
>> printk: Reduce pr_flush() pooling time
>
> JFYI, the patchset has been committed into printk/linux.git,
> branch rework/misc-cleanups.
>
> I am going to push it in the next merge window for 6.7.
> IMHO, the issue is not critical and we are already at 6.6-rc5.
It is a real regression. I think it is important that it goes into
6.6. At least the first patch is simple enough and fixes the regression.
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-10 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-06 8:21 [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: Reduce unnecessary wait times by pr_flush() Petr Mladek
2023-10-06 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] printk: flush consoles before checking progress Petr Mladek
2023-10-06 8:21 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] printk: Reduce pr_flush() pooling time Petr Mladek
2023-10-06 10:12 ` John Ogness
2023-10-10 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] printk: Reduce unnecessary wait times by pr_flush() Petr Mladek
2023-10-10 11:38 ` John Ogness [this message]
2023-10-11 12:10 ` Petr Mladek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87cyxmso5d.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=todd.e.brandt@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox