From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
Frank van der Linden <fllinden@amazon.com>,
Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature
Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2021 21:55:52 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czneeurr.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1635948742.git.msuchanek@suse.de>
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@suse.de> writes:
> S390 uses appended signature for kernel but implements the check
> separately from module loader.
>
> Support for secure boot on powerpc with appended signature is planned -
> grub patches submitted upstream but not yet merged.
Power Non-Virtualised / OpenPower already supports secure boot via kexec
with signature verification via IMA. I think you have now sent a
follow-up series that merges some of the IMA implementation, I just
wanted to make sure it was clear that we actually already have support
for this in the kernel, it's just grub that is getting new support.
> This is an attempt at unified appended signature verification.
I am always in favour of fewer reimplementations of the same feature in
the kernel :)
Regards,
Daniel
>
> Thanks
>
> Michal
>
> Michal Suchanek (3):
> s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification.
> module: strip the signature marker in the verification function.
> powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support.
>
> arch/powerpc/Kconfig | 11 +++++++
> arch/powerpc/kexec/elf_64.c | 14 +++++++++
> arch/s390/kernel/machine_kexec_file.c | 42 +++------------------------
> include/linux/verification.h | 3 ++
> kernel/module-internal.h | 2 --
> kernel/module.c | 11 +++----
> kernel/module_signing.c | 32 ++++++++++++++------
> 7 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-05 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 14:27 [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] s390/kexec_file: Don't opencode appended signature verification Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] module: strip the signature marker in the verification function Michal Suchanek
2021-11-03 14:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] powerpc/kexec_file: Add KEXEC_SIG support Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 0/2] Additional appended signature cleanup Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 1/2] module: Use key_being_used_for for log messages in verify_appended_signature Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 9:55 ` [PATCH 2/2] module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig Michal Suchanek
2021-11-05 10:55 ` Daniel Axtens [this message]
2021-11-05 13:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] KEXEC_SIG with appended signature Michal Suchánek
2021-11-07 22:18 ` Daniel Axtens
2021-11-08 12:05 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-11 22:26 ` Nayna
2021-11-12 8:30 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-15 23:53 ` Nayna
2021-11-16 9:53 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-18 22:34 ` Nayna
2021-11-19 11:18 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-19 18:16 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 11:09 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-24 13:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2021-11-24 13:27 ` Michal Suchánek
2021-11-25 9:14 ` Philipp Rudo
2021-11-11 22:23 ` Nayna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87czneeurr.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net \
--to=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bauerman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=fllinden@amazon.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=msuchanek@suse.de \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox