From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D866C433E9 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA39E61494 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2021 07:11:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1575145AbhCBDxc (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 22:53:32 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:43126 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S244765AbhCAV6V (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2021 16:58:21 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:281:8300:104d::5f6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3EEB22B8; Mon, 1 Mar 2021 21:57:40 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3EEB22B8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1614635860; bh=i6jQL2vEgTZpDiPscbXFNSE/AGEJG68OoQFCzcs14eY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=m5sBTavMke52rPDsk6aPF9PVFu/38tbTbHO05WGk4Yxo2KFTQSKKW+4HchgwPXhZ2 AiNq0lrvJhr6ZD3ClJtjAsAMPB+D/gvmnZBEOHN2Gqo/sS4nX2p8NrX2Kra541iyLe 7APV/lFPjTnh3CvcptaIGCGTCeGvifyCY7arlJgzUfUkux4gOBrNEtbvLLF2A4xptP 3M8jwv3thGIdhu5HGz95SQsB0M4C6VsiRhqW/SqrIRO4ivW+tSCcHaUTW0qT3PPUOA a+p6Hi7m3CKGtdVtw0AtdNY5EWaa7JMOqXaygxmiFcMYhcxVTDFocH2VqwoP/JxdYz iYWm5kTF3P/Ww== From: Jonathan Corbet To: Joe Perches , Dwaipayan Ray , mchehab@kernel.org Cc: lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/3] checkpatch: add verbose mode In-Reply-To: <70877984ec78d837159dc643e3ae2b05fd91561c.camel@perches.com> References: <20210226093827.12700-1-dwaipayanray1@gmail.com> <87tupu36xi.fsf@meer.lwn.net> <70877984ec78d837159dc643e3ae2b05fd91561c.camel@perches.com> Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:57:39 -0700 Message-ID: <87czwi35bg.fsf@meer.lwn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Joe Perches writes: > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 14:22 -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >> Dwaipayan Ray writes: >> >> > Add a new verbose mode to checkpatch. The verbose test >> > descriptions are read from the new checkpatch documentation >> > file at `Documentation/dev-tools/checkpatch.rst`, which >> > is also added by this series. >> >> So I can certainly take the doc change, as requested. Remind me, >> though...should I apply the whole set, or will the checkpatch changes go >> via another path? > > There's no dedicated upstream path for checkpatch. > So please take the checkpatch changes too. OK, I have just done that. Thanks, jon