public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 03/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __get/put_user_inatomic()
Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2021 09:42:44 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czwio5qz.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8732e0c78400c99ec418323ab6b0853b91752be4.1614275314.git.christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>

Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> writes:

> Since commit 662bbcb2747c ("mm, sched: Allow uaccess in atomic with
> pagefault_disable()"), __get/put_user() can be used in atomic parts
> of the code, therefore the __get/put_user_inatomic() introduced
> by commit e68c825bb016 ("[POWERPC] Add inatomic versions of __get_user
> and __put_user") have become useless.

I spent some time chasing these macro definitions.

Let me see if I understand you.

__get_user(x, ptr) becomes __get_user_nocheck(..., true)
__get_user_inatomic() become __get_user_nosleep()

The difference between how __get_user_nosleep() and
__get_user_nocheck(..., true) operate is that __get_user_nocheck calls
might_fault() and __get_user_nosleep() does not.

If I understand the commit you reference and mm/memory.c, you're saying
that we can indeed call might_fault() when page faults are disabled,
because __might_fault() checks if page faults are disabled and does not
fire a warning if it is called with page faults disabled.

Therefore, it is safe to remove our _inatomic version that does not call
might_fault and just to call might_fault unconditionally.

Is that right?

I haven't checked changes you made to the various .c files in fine
detail but they appear to be entirely mechanical.

> powerpc is the only one having such functions. There is a real
> intention not to have to provide such _inatomic() helpers, see the
> comment in might_fault() in mm/memory.c introduced by
> commit 3ee1afa308f2 ("x86: some lock annotations for user
> copy paths, v2"):
>
> 	/*
> 	 * it would be nicer only to annotate paths which are not under
> 	 * pagefault_disable, however that requires a larger audit and
> 	 * providing helpers like get_user_atomic.
> 	 */
>

I'm not fully sure I understand what you're saying in this part of the
commit message.

Kind regards,
Daniel

>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h            | 37 -------------------
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c                   | 32 ++++++++--------
>  .../kernel/hw_breakpoint_constraints.c        |  2 +-
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c                   |  2 +-
>  4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> index a08c482b1315..01aea0df4dd0 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/uaccess.h
> @@ -53,11 +53,6 @@ static inline bool __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>  #define __put_user(x, ptr) \
>  	__put_user_nocheck((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
>  
> -#define __get_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> -	__get_user_nosleep((x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
> -#define __put_user_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> -	__put_user_nosleep((__typeof__(*(ptr)))(x), (ptr), sizeof(*(ptr)))
> -
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
>  
>  #define ___get_user_instr(gu_op, dest, ptr)				\
> @@ -92,9 +87,6 @@ static inline bool __access_ok(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size)
>  #define __get_user_instr(x, ptr) \
>  	___get_user_instr(__get_user, x, ptr)
>  
> -#define __get_user_instr_inatomic(x, ptr) \
> -	___get_user_instr(__get_user_inatomic, x, ptr)
> -
>  extern long __put_user_bad(void);
>  
>  #define __put_user_size(x, ptr, size, retval)			\
> @@ -141,20 +133,6 @@ __pu_failed:							\
>  	__pu_err;							\
>  })
>  
> -#define __put_user_nosleep(x, ptr, size)			\
> -({								\
> -	long __pu_err;						\
> -	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__pu_addr = (ptr);		\
> -	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __pu_val = (x);			\
> -	__typeof__(size) __pu_size = (size);			\
> -								\
> -	__chk_user_ptr(__pu_addr);				\
> -	__put_user_size(__pu_val, __pu_addr, __pu_size, __pu_err); \
> -								\
> -	__pu_err;						\
> -})
> -
> -
>  /*
>   * We don't tell gcc that we are accessing memory, but this is OK
>   * because we do not write to any memory gcc knows about, so there
> @@ -320,21 +298,6 @@ do {								\
>  	__gu_err;							\
>  })
>  
> -#define __get_user_nosleep(x, ptr, size)			\
> -({								\
> -	long __gu_err;						\
> -	__long_type(*(ptr)) __gu_val;				\
> -	__typeof__(*(ptr)) __user *__gu_addr = (ptr);	\
> -	__typeof__(size) __gu_size = (size);			\
> -								\
> -	__chk_user_ptr(__gu_addr);				\
> -	__get_user_size(__gu_val, __gu_addr, __gu_size, __gu_err); \
> -	(x) = (__force __typeof__(*(ptr)))__gu_val;			\
> -								\
> -	__gu_err;						\
> -})
> -
> -
>  /* more complex routines */
>  
>  extern unsigned long __copy_tofrom_user(void __user *to,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
> index c7797eb958c7..83b199026a1e 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/align.c
> @@ -174,18 +174,18 @@ static int emulate_spe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int reg,
>  
>  		switch (nb) {
>  		case 8:
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[0], p++);
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[1], p++);
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[2], p++);
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[3], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[0], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[1], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[2], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[3], p++);
>  			fallthrough;
>  		case 4:
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[4], p++);
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[5], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[4], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[5], p++);
>  			fallthrough;
>  		case 2:
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[6], p++);
> -			ret |= __get_user_inatomic(temp.v[7], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[6], p++);
> +			ret |= __get_user(temp.v[7], p++);
>  			if (unlikely(ret))
>  				return -EFAULT;
>  		}
> @@ -259,18 +259,18 @@ static int emulate_spe(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int reg,
>  		p = addr;
>  		switch (nb) {
>  		case 8:
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[0], p++);
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[1], p++);
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[2], p++);
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[3], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[0], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[1], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[2], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[3], p++);
>  			fallthrough;
>  		case 4:
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[4], p++);
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[5], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[4], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[5], p++);
>  			fallthrough;
>  		case 2:
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[6], p++);
> -			ret |= __put_user_inatomic(data.v[7], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[6], p++);
> +			ret |= __put_user(data.v[7], p++);
>  		}
>  		if (unlikely(ret))
>  			return -EFAULT;
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint_constraints.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint_constraints.c
> index 867ee4aa026a..675d1f66ab72 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint_constraints.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/hw_breakpoint_constraints.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void wp_get_instr_detail(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ppc_inst *instr,
>  {
>  	struct instruction_op op;
>  
> -	if (__get_user_instr_inatomic(*instr, (void __user *)regs->nip))
> +	if (__get_user_instr(*instr, (void __user *)regs->nip))
>  		return;
>  
>  	analyse_instr(&op, regs, *instr);
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> index 1583fd1c6010..1fa36bd08efe 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static void p9_hmi_special_emu(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  	unsigned long ea, msr, msr_mask;
>  	bool swap;
>  
> -	if (__get_user_inatomic(instr, (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip))
> +	if (__get_user(instr, (unsigned int __user *)regs->nip))
>  		return;
>  
>  	/*
> -- 
> 2.25.0

  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-02  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-25 17:50 [PATCH v1 00/15] powerpc: Cleanup of uaccess.h Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 01/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __get_user_allowed() and unsafe_op_wrap() Christophe Leroy
2021-03-01 22:02   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-03-01 22:31     ` Segher Boessenkool
2021-03-10  8:14     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 02/15] powerpc/uaccess: Define ___get_user_instr() for ppc32 Christophe Leroy
2021-03-01 22:20   ` Daniel Axtens
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 03/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __get/put_user_inatomic() Christophe Leroy
2021-03-01 22:42   ` Daniel Axtens [this message]
2021-03-10  8:03     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 04/15] powerpc/uaccess: Move get_user_instr helpers in asm/inst.h Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 05/15] powerpc/align: Don't use __get_user_instr() on kernel addresses Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 06/15] powerpc/uaccess: Call might_fault() inconditionaly Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 07/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __unsafe_put_user_goto() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 08/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove __chk_user_ptr() in __get/put_user Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 09/15] powerpc/uaccess: Remove calls to __get_user_bad() and __put_user_bad() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 10/15] powerpc/uaccess: Split out __get_user_nocheck() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 11/15] powerpc/uaccess: Rename __get/put_user_check/nocheck Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 12/15] powerpc/uaccess: Refactor get/put_user() and __get/put_user() Christophe Leroy
2021-03-07 10:23   ` kernel test robot
2021-03-08 12:14     ` Christophe Leroy
2021-03-08 14:43       ` Christian König
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 13/15] powerpc/uaccess: Swap clear_user() and __clear_user() Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 14/15] powerpc/uaccess: Also perform 64 bits copies in unsafe_copy_to_user() on ppc32 Christophe Leroy
2021-02-25 17:50 ` [PATCH v1 15/15] powerpc/uaccess: Move copy_mc_xxx() functions down Christophe Leroy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87czwio5qz.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net \
    --to=dja@axtens.net \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox