public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	hpa@zytor.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Arvind Sankar <nivedita@alum.mit.edu>,
	Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 8/8] kvm: vmx: virtualize split lock detection
Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2020 12:10:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d08zxtgl.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <88b01989-25cd-90af-bfe8-c236bd5d1dbf@intel.com>

Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
> On 3/25/2020 8:40 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com> writes:
>>>   static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct vcpu_vmx *vmx = to_vmx(vcpu);
>>> @@ -4725,12 +4746,13 @@ static int handle_exception_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>>   	case AC_VECTOR:
>>>   		/*
>>>   		 * Reflect #AC to the guest if it's expecting the #AC, i.e. has
>>> -		 * legacy alignment check enabled.  Pre-check host split lock
>>> -		 * support to avoid the VMREADs needed to check legacy #AC,
>>> -		 * i.e. reflect the #AC if the only possible source is legacy
>>> -		 * alignment checks.
>>> +		 * legacy alignment check enabled or split lock detect enabled.
>>> +		 * Pre-check host split lock support to avoid further check of
>>> +		 * guest, i.e. reflect the #AC if host doesn't enable split lock
>>> +		 * detection.
>>>   		 */
>>>   		if (!split_lock_detect_on() ||
>>> +		    guest_cpu_split_lock_detect_on(vmx) ||
>>>   		    guest_cpu_alignment_check_enabled(vcpu)) {
>> 
>> If the host has split lock detection disabled then how is the guest
>> supposed to have it enabled in the first place?
>> 
> It is ||

Again. If the host has it disabled, then the feature flag is OFF. So
how is the hypervisor exposing it in the first place?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-26 11:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-24 15:18 [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/8] x86/split_lock: Rework the initialization flow " Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/8] x86/split_lock: Avoid runtime reads of the TEST_CTRL MSR Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/8] x86/split_lock: Export handle_user_split_lock() Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 4/8] kvm: x86: Emulate split-lock access as a write in emulator Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  0:00   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25  0:31     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 5/8] kvm: vmx: Extend VMX's #AC interceptor to handle split lock #AC happens in guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 6/8] kvm: x86: Emulate MSR IA32_CORE_CAPABILITIES Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 7/8] kvm: vmx: Enable MSR_TEST_CTRL for intel guest Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  0:07   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 15:18 ` [PATCH v6 8/8] kvm: vmx: virtualize split lock detection Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  0:40   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-25  1:11     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-25  1:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26  1:38         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:08           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 12:31             ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26  6:41     ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 11:10       ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-03-26 12:43         ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 14:55           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-26 15:09             ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-03-26 18:51               ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-03-24 17:47 ` [PATCH v6 0/8] x86/split_lock: Fix and virtualization of " Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d08zxtgl.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nivedita@alum.mit.edu \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox