From: "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
To: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@lge.com>,
<peterz@infradead.org>, <mingo@kernel.org>,
<jiangshanlai@gmail.com>, <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<josh@joshtriplett.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
<len.brown@intel.com>, <glider@google.com>,
<peter@hurleysoftware.com>, <aik@ozlabs.ru>
Subject: Re: [QUESTION] llist: Comment releasing 'must delete' restriction before traversing
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:37:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d0v4mbgx.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1532998716-5037-1-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com> (Byungchul Park's message of "Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:58:36 +0900")
Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> I'm careful in saying.. and curious about..
>
> In restrictive cases like only addtions happen but never deletion, can't
> we safely traverse a llist? I believe llist can be more useful if we can
> release the restriction. Can't we?
>
> If yes, we may add another function traversing starting from a head. Or
> just use existing funtion with head->first.
>
> Thank a lot for your answers in advance :)
What's the use case? I don't know how it is useful that items are never
deleted from the llist.
Some other locks could be used to provide mutual exclusive between
- llist add, llist traverse
and
- llist delete
Is this your use case?
Best Regards,
Huang, Ying
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-31 1:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-31 0:58 [QUESTION] llist: Comment releasing 'must delete' restriction before traversing Byungchul Park
2018-07-31 1:37 ` Huang, Ying [this message]
2018-07-31 5:25 ` Byungchul Park
2018-07-31 5:45 ` Huang, Ying
2018-07-31 4:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-31 9:29 ` Byungchul Park
2018-07-31 14:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-08-01 5:34 ` Byungchul Park
2018-08-01 5:43 ` Huang, Ying
2018-08-01 8:52 ` Byungchul Park
2018-07-31 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-07-31 9:38 ` Byungchul Park
2018-07-31 13:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-08-01 5:35 ` Byungchul Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d0v4mbgx.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com \
--to=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
--cc=byungchul.park@lge.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox