From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751241AbdGMAxF (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:53:05 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:54703 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751154AbdGMAxD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Jul 2017 20:53:03 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Linus Torvalds Cc: , Linux Containers , , Andrei Vagin Date: Wed, 12 Jul 2017 19:45:04 -0500 Message-ID: <87d195f9m7.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1dVSNE-0000wU-C8;;;mid=<87d195f9m7.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=67.3.213.87;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1+0X4lnyJ3vS6bCn97wHhRRfKIpmHCraCI= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.3.213.87 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5000] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.1 XMSolicitRefs_0 Weightloss drug * 1.0 T_XMDrugObfuBody_12 obfuscated drug references * 1.0 XMSubMetaSx_00 1+ Sexy Words * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 1.2 XMSubMetaSxObfu_03 Obfuscated Sexy Noun-People X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa08 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ***;Linus Torvalds X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 5684 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.5 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (0.0%), parse: 0.83 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (0.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 3.6 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 4.8 (0.1%), tests_pri_-950: 0.86 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.73 (0.0%), tests_pri_-400: 37 (0.7%), check_bayes: 37 (0.6%), b_tokenize: 9 (0.2%), b_tok_get_all: 12 (0.2%), b_comp_prob: 2.3 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 9 (0.2%), b_finish: 2.2 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 316 (5.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.43 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.9 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 5302 (93.3%), poll_dns_idle: 5295 (93.2%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: [GIT PULL] sysctl fixes for v4.13-rc1 X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Linus, Please pull the for-linus branch from the git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiederm/user-namespace.git for-linus HEAD: 2fd1d2c4ceb2248a727696962cf3370dc9f5a0a4 proc: Fix proc_sys_prune_dcache to hold a sb reference A rather embarassing and hard to hit bug was merged into 4.11-rc1. Andrei Vagin tracked this bug now and after some starting at the code I came up with a fix. Eric >>From 2fd1d2c4ceb2248a727696962cf3370dc9f5a0a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric W. Biederman" Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 08:41:06 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] proc: Fix proc_sys_prune_dcache to hold a sb reference Andrei Vagin writes: FYI: This bug has been reproduced on 4.11.7 > BUG: Dentry ffff895a3dd01240{i=4e7c09a,n=lo} still in use (1) [unmount of proc proc] > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 13588 at fs/dcache.c:1445 umount_check+0x6e/0x80 > CPU: 1 PID: 13588 Comm: kworker/1:1 Not tainted 4.11.7-200.fc25.x86_64 #1 > Hardware name: CompuLab sbc-flt1/fitlet, BIOS SBCFLT_0.08.04 06/27/2015 > Workqueue: events proc_cleanup_work > Call Trace: > dump_stack+0x63/0x86 > __warn+0xcb/0xf0 > warn_slowpath_null+0x1d/0x20 > umount_check+0x6e/0x80 > d_walk+0xc6/0x270 > ? dentry_free+0x80/0x80 > do_one_tree+0x26/0x40 > shrink_dcache_for_umount+0x2d/0x90 > generic_shutdown_super+0x1f/0xf0 > kill_anon_super+0x12/0x20 > proc_kill_sb+0x40/0x50 > deactivate_locked_super+0x43/0x70 > deactivate_super+0x5a/0x60 > cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x90 > mntput_no_expire+0x13b/0x190 > kern_unmount+0x3e/0x50 > pid_ns_release_proc+0x15/0x20 > proc_cleanup_work+0x15/0x20 > process_one_work+0x197/0x450 > worker_thread+0x4e/0x4a0 > kthread+0x109/0x140 > ? process_one_work+0x450/0x450 > ? kthread_park+0x90/0x90 > ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x40 > ---[ end trace e1c109611e5d0b41 ]--- > VFS: Busy inodes after unmount of proc. Self-destruct in 5 seconds. Have a nice day... > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) > IP: _raw_spin_lock+0xc/0x30 > PGD 0 Fix this by taking a reference to the super block in proc_sys_prune_dcache. The superblock reference is the core of the fix however the sysctl_inodes list is converted to a hlist so that hlist_del_init_rcu may be used. This allows proc_sys_prune_dache to remove inodes the sysctl_inodes list, while not causing problems for proc_sys_evict_inode when if it later choses to remove the inode from the sysctl_inodes list. Removing inodes from the sysctl_inodes list allows proc_sys_prune_dcache to have a progress guarantee, while still being able to drop all locks. The fact that head->unregistering is set in start_unregistering ensures that no more inodes will be added to the the sysctl_inodes list. Previously the code did a dance where it delayed calling iput until the next entry in the list was being considered to ensure the inode remained on the sysctl_inodes list until the next entry was walked to. The structure of the loop in this patch does not need that so is much easier to understand and maintain. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Andrei Vagin Tested-by: Andrei Vagin Fixes: ace0c791e6c3 ("proc/sysctl: Don't grab i_lock under sysctl_lock.") Fixes: d6cffbbe9a7e ("proc/sysctl: prune stale dentries during unregistering") Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" --- fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- include/linux/sysctl.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index c5ae09b6c726..18694598bebf 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ struct proc_inode { struct proc_dir_entry *pde; struct ctl_table_header *sysctl; struct ctl_table *sysctl_entry; - struct list_head sysctl_inodes; + struct hlist_node sysctl_inodes; const struct proc_ns_operations *ns_ops; struct inode vfs_inode; }; diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index 67985a7233c2..9bf06e2b1284 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static void init_header(struct ctl_table_header *head, head->set = set; head->parent = NULL; head->node = node; - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&head->inodes); + INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&head->inodes); if (node) { struct ctl_table *entry; for (entry = table; entry->procname; entry++, node++) @@ -261,25 +261,42 @@ static void unuse_table(struct ctl_table_header *p) complete(p->unregistering); } -/* called under sysctl_lock */ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) { - struct inode *inode, *prev = NULL; + struct inode *inode; struct proc_inode *ei; + struct hlist_node *node; + struct super_block *sb; rcu_read_lock(); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(ei, &head->inodes, sysctl_inodes) { - inode = igrab(&ei->vfs_inode); - if (inode) { - rcu_read_unlock(); - iput(prev); - prev = inode; - d_prune_aliases(inode); + for (;;) { + node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes); + if (!node) + break; + ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sysctl_inodes); + spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes); + spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); + + inode = &ei->vfs_inode; + sb = inode->i_sb; + if (!atomic_inc_not_zero(&sb->s_active)) + continue; + inode = igrab(inode); + rcu_read_unlock(); + if (unlikely(!inode)) { + deactivate_super(sb); rcu_read_lock(); + continue; } + + d_prune_aliases(inode); + iput(inode); + deactivate_super(sb); + + rcu_read_lock(); } rcu_read_unlock(); - iput(prev); } /* called under sysctl_lock, will reacquire if has to wait */ @@ -461,7 +478,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, } ei->sysctl = head; ei->sysctl_entry = table; - list_add_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes); + hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes); head->count++; spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); @@ -489,7 +506,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, void proc_sys_evict_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ctl_table_header *head) { spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - list_del_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes); if (!--head->count) kfree_rcu(head, rcu); spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); diff --git a/include/linux/sysctl.h b/include/linux/sysctl.h index 80d07816def0..1c04a26bfd2f 100644 --- a/include/linux/sysctl.h +++ b/include/linux/sysctl.h @@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ struct ctl_table_header struct ctl_table_set *set; struct ctl_dir *parent; struct ctl_node *node; - struct list_head inodes; /* head for proc_inode->sysctl_inodes */ + struct hlist_head inodes; /* head for proc_inode->sysctl_inodes */ }; struct ctl_dir { -- 2.10.1