public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: david.vrabel@citrix.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com, jgross@suse.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	xen-devel@lists.xen.org
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d1v7v0t8.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564C8531.2000608@oracle.com> (Boris Ostrovsky's message of "Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:03:29 -0500")

Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> writes:

> On 11/18/2015 06:16 AM, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> writes:
>>
>>> After commit 8c058b0b9c34 ("x86/irq: Probe for PIC presence before
>>> allocating descs for legacy IRQs") early_irq_init() will no longer
>>> preallocate descriptors for legacy interrupts if PIT does not
>>> exist.
>> PIC?
>
> Right. David, can you fix this before committing?
>
>>
>>> Therefore we need to allocate those descriptors for PV guests
>>> ourselves.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
>>> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 8 ++++----
>>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>>> index 849500e..a2bb333 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>>> @@ -419,8 +419,8 @@ static int __must_check xen_allocate_irq_gsi(unsigned gsi)
>>>   	if (xen_pv_domain() && !xen_initial_domain())
>>>   		return xen_allocate_irq_dynamic();
>>>
>>> -	/* Legacy IRQ descriptors are already allocated by the arch. */
>>> -	if (gsi < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
>>> +	/* On HVM legacy IRQ descriptors are already allocated by the arch. */
>>> +	if (xen_hvm_domain() && gsi < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
>>>   		irq = gsi;
>> Wouldn't it be better to write it as
>>   if (gsi < nr_legacy_irqs()) ?
>
> I don't think so: on PV we end up setting legacy_pic to
> null_legacy_pic in probe_8259A() and that will make nr_legacy_irqs()
> return 0.

Yes, so the condition will always be false for PV and it equals to
xen_hvm_domain() or am I missng something?

>
>>
>> I think it's possible to have PIC-less HVM guests in future (btw, what
>> about HVMlite?). I see nr_legacy_irqs() is x86-only but it can easily be
>> defined to NR_IRQS_LEGACY on other arches.
>
> Yes, HVMlite (or however we will end up calling it) will allow these
> sorts of thing. But HVMlite is not supported yet at all. And it's x86
> only.
>
> -boris
>
>>
>>>   	else
>>>   		irq = irq_alloc_desc_at(gsi, -1);
>>> @@ -445,8 +445,8 @@ static void xen_free_irq(unsigned irq)
>>>
>>>   	kfree(info);
>>>
>>> -	/* Legacy IRQ descriptors are managed by the arch. */
>>> -	if (irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
>>> +	/* On HVM legacy IRQ descriptors are managed by the arch. */
>>> +	if (xen_hvm_domain() && irq < NR_IRQS_LEGACY)
>>>   		return;
>>>
>>>   	irq_free_desc(irq);

-- 
  Vitaly

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-17 15:36 [PATCH] xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-17 15:38 ` David Vrabel
2015-11-17 16:24 ` Juergen Gross
2015-11-18 11:16 ` [Xen-devel] " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2015-11-18 14:03   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-18 14:28     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2015-11-18 15:00       ` Boris Ostrovsky
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-20 16:25 Boris Ostrovsky
2015-11-26 18:22 ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d1v7v0t8.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xen.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox