public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 12:10:53 +1030	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d268c3mi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54BE082A.20207@ispras.ru>

Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru> writes:
> 20.01.2015 9:37, Rusty Russell пишет:
>> Andrey Tsyvarev <tsyvarev@ispras.ru> writes:
>>> parse_args call module parameters' .set handlers, which may use locks defined in the module.
>>> So, these classes should be freed in case parse_args returns error(e.g. due to incorrect parameter passed).
>> Thanks, this seems right.  Applied.
>>
>> But this makes me ask: where is lockdep_free_key_range() called on the
>> module init code?  It doesn't seem to be at all...
> As I understand, locks are not allowed to be defined in the module init 
> section. So, no needs to call lockdep_free_key_range() for it.
> This has a sense: objects from that section are allowed to be used only 
> by module->init() function. But a single function call doesn't require 
> any synchronization wrt itself.

I don't know that we have any __initdata locks; it would be really
weird.

But change 'static DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_param);' to 'static __initdata
DEFINE_MUTEX(mutex_param);' to test.

Cheers,
Rusty.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-21  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14  6:25 [PATCH] kernel/module.c: Free lock-classes if parse_args failed Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20  6:37 ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-20  7:47   ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-21  1:40     ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2015-01-21 10:49       ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-22  0:40         ` Rusty Russell
2015-01-22  9:27           ` Andrey Tsyvarev
2015-01-20  9:48   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19  0:12     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-02-19 11:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-02-19 12:24         ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d268c3mi.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
    --to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tsyvarev@ispras.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox