public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com>
Cc: <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>,
	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
	Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com>,
	Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/4] xen/pvhvm: Unmap all PIRQs on startup and shutdown
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 15:50:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2coe0kk.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D6536E.70104@citrix.com> (David Vrabel's message of "Mon, 28 Jul 2014 14:43:10 +0100")

David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> writes:

> On 15/07/14 14:40, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> When kexec is being run PIRQs from Qemu-emulated devices are still
>> mapped to old event channels and new kernel has no information about
>> that. Trying to map them twice results in the following in Xen's dmesg:
>> 
>>  (XEN) irq.c:2278: dom7: pirq 24 or emuirq 8 already mapped
>>  (XEN) irq.c:2278: dom7: pirq 24 or emuirq 12 already mapped
>>  (XEN) irq.c:2278: dom7: pirq 24 or emuirq 1 already mapped
>>  ...
>> 
>>  and the following in new kernel's dmesg:
>> 
>>  [   92.286796] xen:events: Failed to obtain physical IRQ 4
>> 
>> The result is that the new kernel doesn't recieve IRQs for Qemu-emulated
>> devices. Address the issue by unmapping all mapped PIRQs on kernel shutdown
>> when kexec was requested and on every kernel startup. We need to do this
>> twice to deal with the following issues:
>> - startup-time unmapping is required to make kdump work;
>> - shutdown-time unmapping is required to support kexec-ing non-fixed kernels;
>> - shutdown-time unmapping is required to make Qemu-emulated NICs work after
>>   kexec (event channel is being closed on shutdown but no PHYSDEVOP_unmap_pirq
>>   is being performed).
>
> I think this should be done only in one place -- just prior to exec'ing
> the new kernel (including kdump kernels).
>

Thank you for your comments!

The problem I'm fighting wiht atm is: with FIFO-based event channels we
need to call evtchn_fifo_destroy() so next EVTCHNOP_init_control won't
fail. I was intended to put evtchn_fifo_destroy() in
EVTCHNOP_reset. That introduces a problem: we need to deal with
store/console channels. It is possible to remap those from guest with
EVTCHNOP_bind_interdomain (if we remember where they were mapped before)
but we can't do it after we did evtchn_fifo_destroy() and we can't
rebind them after kexec and performing EVTCHNOP_init_control as
we can't remember where these channels were mapped to after kexec/kdump.

I see the following possible solutions:
1) We put evtchn_fifo_destroy() in EVTCHNOP_init_control so
EVTCHNOP_init_control can be called twice. No EVTCHNOP_reset is required
in that case.

2) Introduce special (e.g. 'EVTCHNOP_fifo_destroy') hypercall to do
evtchn_fifo_destroy() without closing all channels. Alternatively we can
avoid closing all channels in EVTCHNOP_reset when called with DOMID_SELF
(as this mode is not being used atm) -- but that would look unobvious.

3) Keep evtchn_fifo_destroy() in EVTCHNOP_reset but keep console/store
channels -- I saw your concerns it is not safe, some sort of additional
blocking will be required.

4) Do the remapping boot time (query for store/console channels ->
perform EVTCHNOP_reset -> rebind with EVTCHNOP_bind_interdomain).

There is an additional problem: EVTCHNOP_bind_interdomain operation has
local port as OUT parameter so we can't guarantee that remapping
store/console channels will remap them to the same local channel they
were mapped before EVTCHNOP_reset (and we have this information in hvm
info: HVM_PARAM_CONSOLE_EVTCHN/HVM_PARAM_STORE_EVTCHN, ...). Not sure
how to deal with that in case we go with remapping.

Your thoughts would be very appreciated. Thank you again,

>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/smp.c
>> @@ -768,6 +768,7 @@ void xen_kexec_shutdown(void)
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_KEXEC
>>  	if (!kexec_in_progress)
>>  		return;
>> +	xen_unmap_all_pirqs();
>>  #endif
>>  }
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> index c919d3d..7701c7f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> +++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
>> @@ -1643,6 +1643,80 @@ void xen_callback_vector(void) {}
>>  static bool fifo_events = true;
>>  module_param(fifo_events, bool, 0);
>>  
>> +void xen_unmap_all_pirqs(void)
>> +{
>> +	int pirq, rc, gsi, irq, evtchn;
>> +	struct physdev_unmap_pirq unmap_irq;
>> +	struct irq_info *info;
>> +	struct evtchn_close close;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&irq_mapping_update_lock);
>> +
>> +	list_for_each_entry(info, &xen_irq_list_head, list) {
>> +		if (info->type != IRQT_PIRQ)
>> +			continue;
>
> I think you need to do this by querying Xen state rather than relying on
> potentially bad guest state.  Particularly since you may crash while
> holding irq_mapping_update_lock.
>
> EVTCHNOP_status gets you the info you need I think.
>
> David

-- 
  Vitaly

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-29 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-15 13:40 [PATCH RFC 0/4] xen/pvhvm: fix shared_info and pirq issues with kexec Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC 1/4] xen PVonHVM: use E820_Reserved area for shared_info Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:06   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 15:43     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:50       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-18 11:05         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-18 13:56           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-18 15:45             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-28 13:33   ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 15:15     ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC 2/4] xen/pvhvm: Introduce xen_pvhvm_kexec_shutdown() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:09   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 15:52     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:58       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-15 17:41   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2014-07-28 13:36   ` David Vrabel
2014-07-15 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC 3/4] xen/pvhvm: Unmap all PIRQs on startup and shutdown Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:23   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-16  9:37     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-16 13:45       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-16 16:34         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-28 13:43   ` David Vrabel
2014-07-29 13:50     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2014-07-29 15:25       ` [Xen-devel] " David Vrabel
2014-07-29 17:06         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-29 17:12           ` David Vrabel
2014-07-15 13:40 ` [PATCH RFC 4/4] xen/pvhvm: Make MSI IRQs work after kexec Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-15 15:21   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-16  9:01     ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-16 13:40       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-16 17:20         ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-16 17:30           ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2014-07-17  8:12             ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-07-28 13:47           ` David Vrabel
2014-07-21 14:13         ` Stefano Stabellini
2014-07-28 13:24 ` [PATCH RFC 0/4] xen/pvhvm: fix shared_info and pirq issues with kexec David Vrabel
2014-08-01 12:21   ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2014-08-01 13:00     ` David Vrabel
2014-08-04 15:44       ` Vitaly Kuznetsov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2coe0kk.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=david.vrabel@citrix.com \
    --cc=drjones@redhat.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox