linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"intel-gfx\@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@debian.org>,
	"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"dri-devel\@lists.freedesktop.org"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>, "Lee\,
	Chun-Yi" <joeyli.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com>,
	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>,
	Lee Chun-Yi <jlee@novell.com>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / video / i915: Remove ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:29:29 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2ofy7li.fsf@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1378889140.945.0.camel@x230.lan>

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013, Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 11:45 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>
>> Before plunging forward, have you observed any difference between the
>> boot modes? We have reports [1] that the backlight behaviour is
>> different with UEFI vs. UEFI+CSM or legacy boot. So I'm wondering if the
>> acpi_gbl_osi_data >= ACPI_OSI_WIN_8 check in patch 2/2 is the whole
>> story.
>> 
>> Further, if we tell the BIOS we're Windows 8 to use the tested BIOS code
>> paths, what guarantees do we have of UEFI+CSM or legacy boots working?
>
> We have no evidence of Windows behaving differently based on the exposed
> firmware type.

By "behaving differently", do you mean internally adapting to the boot
mode, or exhibiting different behaviour to the user?

We have evidence of the firmware behaving differently (VBT, backlight)
based on the boot mode, all else being equal. We don't adapt to that,
and we fail. I don't know if we should adapt, or do things differently
altogether. I don't even know if Windows 8 works on all boot modes on
the machines in question.


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-09-11 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-09  8:37 [PATCH 0/2] Rework ACPI video driver Aaron Lu
2013-09-09  8:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] ACPI / video: seperate backlight control and event interface Aaron Lu
2013-09-10  5:23   ` Igor Gnatenko
2013-09-09  8:42 ` [PATCH 2/2] ACPI / video / i915: Remove ACPI backlight if firmware expects Windows 8 Aaron Lu
2013-09-09  9:32   ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-09 12:16     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-09 15:21       ` Daniel Vetter
2013-09-09 15:38         ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-09 20:23         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-10 13:53           ` Jani Nikula
2013-09-10 13:56             ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 14:21               ` Jani Nikula
2013-09-10 14:21                 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-10 19:23             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-09-11  1:32               ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-11  8:45                 ` Jani Nikula
2013-09-11  8:45                   ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-11  9:09                     ` Yves-Alexis Perez
2013-09-11 10:29                     ` Jani Nikula [this message]
2013-09-11 10:30                       ` Matthew Garrett
2013-09-12  2:26                   ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-10  6:30     ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-09 11:44   ` Igor Gnatenko
2013-09-10  3:27     ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-10  5:13       ` Igor Gnatenko
2013-09-10  5:16         ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-10  5:22           ` Igor Gnatenko
2013-09-10  5:42             ` Aaron Lu
2013-09-10  5:23   ` Igor Gnatenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87d2ofy7li.fsf@intel.com \
    --to=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=corsac@debian.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=hmh@hmh.eng.br \
    --cc=i.gnatenko.brain@gmail.com \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jlee@novell.com \
    --cc=joeyli.kernel@gmail.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.garrett@nebula.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).