From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>,
Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND/V2] crypto: Ignore validity dates of X.509 certificates at loading/parsing time
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 11:43:41 +0930 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2ryr7l6.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B06FC3.8090405@ahsoftware.de>
Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de> writes:
> Am 02.05.2013 16:09, schrieb Alexander Holler:
>> I don't see any real use case where checking the validity dates of X.509
>> certificates at parsing time adds any security gain. In contrast, doing so
>> makes MODSIGN unusable on systems without a RTC (or systems with a possible
>> wrong date in a existing RTC, or systems where the RTC is read after the keys
>> got loaded).
>>
>> If something really cares about the dates, it should check them at the time
>> when the certificates are used, not when they are loaded and parsed.
>>
>> So just remove the validity check of the dates in the parser.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
>> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> As it just happened to me again and I've recently posted some patches
> which do make it possible to experience the problem on x86 systems too,
> here is a reminder.
>
> To replay the problem (on x86 or any other arch), apply the 3 patches in
> this series:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/5/430
>
> build a kernel with CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_FORCE=y and start that kernel with
> hctosys=none as kernel command line parameter.
>
> This will disable the "persistent" clock (and any RTC), thus the kernel
> will refuse to load modules because it doesn't has a valid time when
> loading the certificate.
>
> Regards,
>
> Alexander Holler
David?
Thanks,
Rusty.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 3:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-27 18:41 [PATCH] crypto: Ignore validity dates of X.509 certificates at loading/parsing time Alexander Holler
2013-05-02 14:09 ` [PATCH RESEND/V2] " Alexander Holler
2013-06-06 11:17 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-07 2:13 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d2ryr7l6.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox