From: Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Kevin Liu <keyuan.liu@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org List"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@samsung.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@mail.ru>,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: Regulator API ignored return values
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:41:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d2uro09v.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y5dsheqo.fsf@octavius.laptop.org> (Chris Ball's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:30:55 -0400")
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Chris Ball wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 12 2013, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> Need add regulator_put here since regulator_get has succeed?
>>
>> Hmm, we still don't actually bail out if the error is encountered, so
>> the reference count is balanced with the current patch, but I maybe
>> a failed regulator_enable() should actually be a fatal error?
>
> The reason I didn't make it a fatal error is that this is just vqmmc
> (responsible for moving from 3.3V to 1.8V for UHS modes), not the
> main vmmc regulator. We can just disable those UHS modes from the
> capabilities on the host if vqmmc is missing, or failed to enable,
> or doesn't support those voltages, and that's what the code does now.
I've pushed this patch to mmc-next for 3.10 now, let me know if you
disagree.
Thanks,
- Chris.
--
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org> <http://printf.net/>
One Laptop Per Child
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-22 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <25B60CDC2F704E4E9D88FFD52780CB4C0BDEB0547F@SC-VEXCH1.marvell.com>
2013-03-12 4:15 ` FW: Regulator API ignored return values Kevin Liu
2013-03-12 14:03 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-12 14:30 ` Chris Ball
2013-03-22 16:41 ` Chris Ball [this message]
2013-03-22 17:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87d2uro09v.fsf@octavius.laptop.org \
--to=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=axel.lin@ingics.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=dtor@mail.ru \
--cc=jg1.han@samsung.com \
--cc=keyuan.liu@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox