Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] fat: restructure export_operations

[OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>]

Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@gmail.com> writes:

>>> +     if (parent && (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITH_PARENT)) {
>>> +             *lenp = FAT_FID_SIZE_WITH_PARENT;
>>> +             return 255;
>>> +     } else if (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT) {
>>> +             *lenp = FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT;
>>> +             return 255;
>>> +     }
>>
>> This check strange. "parent && len == FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT" will
>> overwrite over limit of fh size?
> I need to check more. because I followed the logic in
> export_encode_fh() function.

Ah, my fault, it doesn't have real problem. But code is quite strange.

If input is "parent && len >= FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT", "else if
(len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT)" check is entirely useless, but this
code itself checks "len".

if (parent) {
	if (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITH_PARENT)
		/* error */
} else {
	if (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT)
		/* error */
}

I think this would readable, and I guess this will generates faster/simpler
code (at least, this doesn't depends an optimization of gcc).

Thanks.
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>