From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752154Ab1IOAck (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:32:40 -0400
Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:47731 "EHLO ozlabs.org"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751519Ab1IOAci convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 14 Sep 2011 20:32:38 -0400
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        Brian Swetland <swetland@google.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
        davinci-linux-open-source 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 7/8] drivers: introduce rpmsg, a remote-processor messaging bus
In-Reply-To: <CAK=WgbY0zMkHw9XHDKPEfVQZVRfGP=nMmyJgm6jD5FEkBZkMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1308640714-17961-1-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <1308640714-17961-8-git-send-email-ohad@wizery.com> <87liwu8u3q.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <BANLkTi=7TBMqnEf2qustrmSaubtTam79Bw@mail.gmail.com> <CAK=WgbY0zMkHw9XHDKPEfVQZVRfGP=nMmyJgm6jD5FEkBZkMRQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.2.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 09:42:05 +0930
Message-ID: <87d3f2hdey.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 21:38:43 +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> Hi Rusty,
> 
> On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> >> On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 10:18:33 +0300, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
> >>> +#define VIRTIO_ID_RPMSG              10 /* virtio remote processor messaging */
> >>
> >> I think you want 6.  Plan 9 jumped ahead to grab 9 :)
> >
> > 6 it is :)
> 
> Looking at the virtio-spec, it seems that 6 is taken by 'ioMemory'.
> There's no indication for it in virtio_ids.h though, and the
> virtio-spec has no appendix for this id, so maybe it's available after
> all ?
> 
> If it is available, I'll take it for rpmsg, and will also update
> virtio-spec appropriately. Otherwise, we'll settle on 7 ? :)

7... numbers are cheap :)

Cheers,
Rusty.