From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:33:31 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:33:21 -0500 Received: from p3E9D38F7.dip.t-dialin.net ([62.157.56.247]:24068 "EHLO gryffindor.sc") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 07:33:10 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /proc & xml data In-Reply-To: <39FCDB16.B0955558@mindspring.com> From: Moritz Schulte Organization: Foobar X-Mailer: Gnus v5.8.3 Date: 30 Oct 2000 13:33:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: ebiederm@xmission.com's message of "29 Oct 2000 23:54:24 -0700" Message-ID: <87d7giecg3.fsf@gryffindor.sc> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0803 (Gnus v5.8.3) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) writes: > The general consensus is that if we have a major reorganization, in proc > the rule will be one value per file. And let directories do the grouping. IIRC some time ago somebody suggested to rename 'proc' to something like 'sys' or 'system', because it contains so many sytem information, not only about processes; or extract all non-process-information from proc to sys. Will this, or something like that, eventually be done while the reorganization? moritz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/