From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF904288C31; Wed, 7 May 2025 13:42:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746625366; cv=none; b=Y2QAIr0bTViDSMXaUssP36VcZ3bsRanx4zY04J+1GrttePBVoMclAamlrxVpCnSPU1TB6OhoN+LIbQfZi0ZGURpYrbkmaHtodQcIDWWu74Kn07vTy2v3FpO0G454B3jQxKuPZ54KkTz/krbt+8HhB+bjHnRBHk4KVR017E/4kHI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746625366; c=relaxed/simple; bh=N8KXT+l+D+lLX+vY9DktI9wLlLwQ03ofPvB1zg8b/f0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=S3/YtZdnP+xo/TJuul8PDkehIQ26TmWMrbaRue6GUVzc0yf8ZZKdA5qEvyx4Xs/VKQqLLpvjU1v+5nIY4TcVWBwhSWrJE65NnzW/Vgi5afBItmQV9gW6UfD6vzcEMFyQkZC12JMdviQDIyFRF4LENVnjUqfLVY3ExmsKbqBzrHY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=shOSxWFZ; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=NXcqGGel; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="shOSxWFZ"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="NXcqGGel" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1746625362; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+78+2+2l+vz4thd4fzsZIiDpYheZnEoUC6X/M8JFQ+I=; b=shOSxWFZela5XBLLbauvJz9BG7m+vqSD0Gy+bN4oCEnkdqUNvURj+ZqKa26k7Yhx050RTI y0evKBTwX+2HhVBFGikRYaSMpFzbdf3qCBFhZ1aVeYmp1HL+Rlqj0fwMh+IoUxTiZejTt0 V7HSXvo9DwC8S7pe0MzLSkm4/IJZFFe4UEOT58nZIam9xY6vye2DF0uvNTN4uRiZ0h8CSi jwN6IqfZ+a1Ebi5yyxkwOsY2lE9ZI3J1lKOTngOD0rDvtVTg7ylZPDQhznHloukop+QMK+ XqDCXf1o9eFcrQA7mNGJOMqVjHA6v1ycMdgcbWUdmxfrLlgm0j64iwqgWzw2wQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1746625362; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=+78+2+2l+vz4thd4fzsZIiDpYheZnEoUC6X/M8JFQ+I=; b=NXcqGGelg10I9lqrw8our10jEDm1FPuD5NTxtrDwGvSU2XzWT6j6WMq8MIDa9K547nbkqR SlQVWlkvvexVEABw== To: Marc Zyngier Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Bischoff , Timothy Hayes , "Liam R. Howlett" , Mark Rutland , Jiri Slaby , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/25] irqchip/gic-v5: Add GICv5 PPI support In-Reply-To: <86a57ohjey.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20250506-gicv5-host-v3-0-6edd5a92fd09@kernel.org> <20250506-gicv5-host-v3-20-6edd5a92fd09@kernel.org> <87zffpn5rk.ffs@tglx> <86a57ohjey.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 07 May 2025 15:42:42 +0200 Message-ID: <87ecx0mt9p.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, May 07 2025 at 10:14, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2025 16:00:31 +0100, > Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> >> How does this test distinguish between LEVEL_LOW and LEVEL_HIGH? It only >> tests for level, no? So the test is interesting at best ... > > There is no distinction between HIGH and LOW, RISING and FALLING, in > any revision of the GIC architecture. Then pretending that there is a set_type() functionality is pretty daft