From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F2C1E3DDE for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741778016; cv=none; b=quBUhbuEmiAEHHXDyOvuH+42/QvsuVXS9ERauYqNHbpkfuxy96QdsSNfQdiXqHqT8AELyGXDWmhSsKK+EHM8K8NhpH9XAAd0xw6HrMbue9Dr3njmjQKcwUlhOF1xyN3EincSOhRefwpnh3dv0/pXO6WEA+1PE/XRUu48R6aNq4k= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1741778016; c=relaxed/simple; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YMWqFTjqe7FnzhHpExacxm3dEQUT9LDpI6b2UESmG8d2GdfDJoP30kLYRb3dITaZoJ1SpQNYkDjjedwIg0C7R4PC5H7EYi7DY3a8afwo8PEzYXduZCjmWRTJLOmgkJp/3JJCXitPFUE1uRG5a98u2S4zzlGVj+0esX6Cq6Srvrs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=gxmrM4/m; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Qcr4dsqJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="gxmrM4/m"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Qcr4dsqJ" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1741778012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; b=gxmrM4/m2Wt5JxPlKmgnKRLZRmBCBhcnTiN1uFdwuaQH030fM0iTodcR3mwiSwUwYlbHsm iR9Nn7JjkUBCR0K9Hta/OkoXomkdkS36havPDroloZuuLAb7LcLcNXXUKYebOydppcz6Kp sDSjVJdC2kAm58jGCmk/uNNLr3+UhcOAR3SNqdi2UFFYW/YNzB8L2Tt2zlrkbXmF45fFTw oXrEtszEXSR91P9pwJMxTiNgtBIwHe0BYUTW/6GSkgT0jhXzeEuH1sPd0HSEKIVLyWS/Dr gqaO2KgnusML2AAcdrrcx3iyuAvGZo7ZHf582gSfpLBqgBpR13Yxg3iWAfGolg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1741778012; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UYwUjaR6v1q5/fQ/hypQGLb8gy+5OfN5YPZ0I1ZBiRY=; b=Qcr4dsqJiy327DE7wJ6oI0CAzPdppIEwqEJmnCx/6TzoobWgsGgXmWZgQ1h/nzjVvRdxCd 6zE2N6gjr8DmTOCg== To: Linus Walleij , Russell King Cc: Linux ARM , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel , "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Generic entry for ARM In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:13:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87ecz2zelf.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Fri, Feb 28 2025 at 13:49, Linus Walleij wrote: > please consider pulling the following git branch for generic entry, > see below. > > This branch was just harvested from my own v5 patch series on > lore with b4 am -t 20250225-arm-generic-entry-v5-0-2f02313653e5@linaro.org > then git am on top of v6.14-rc1, so you can do the same if you > prefer. > > It's possible to squash patches, even all of them into one > big all-or-nothing patch, given the not very gradual nature generic > entry conversion seems to have. > > Main upsides and downsides are in the signed tag. > > I don't know who the most important stakeholders are, but I guess > the context tracker maintainer (Paul McKenney) and the people working > on generic entry (tglx) could have a say on how important this is, or isn't. > > I think it's pretty neat. It's valuable to consolidate these common functionalities across architectures as it reduces maintainence costs. I read through the patches and did not find anything offending there. Thanks for doing that! Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner